Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
Thomson
Essential Science Indicators - Special Topics  RSS feeds for the editorial Web sites of Essential Science Indicators.
All Topics Menu
Help || About || Contact

  
|  Previous Page  |
  |  Special Topics Menu  |  |  Next Page  |
  

ESI Special Topic of:
"Aryl Halide Chemistry," Published May 2003

•> Search Special Topics
Aryl Halide Chemistry Menu

Aryl Halide Chemistry

An INTERVIEW with John P. Wolfe

ESI Special Topics, June 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/aryl/interviews/JohnPWolfe.html

In this interview, Special Topics correspondent Gary Taubes talks with the University of Michigan’s John Wolfe about his highly cited work in Aryl Halide Chemistry. In our analysis, Dr. Wolfe is the third-most-cited author in this specialized field, with 9 papers cited a total of 963 times over the past decade. He is also a co-author of the paper ranked at #2 in our survey: "A highly active catalyst for palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions: room temperature Suzuki couplings and amination of unactivated aryl chlorides" (Journal of the American Chemical Society 120[37]: 9722-3, 23 September 1998). In the ISI Essential Science Indicators Web product, Dr. Wolfe has 22 papers cited a total of 1,840 times to date in the field of Chemistry. Dr. Wolfe is an Assistant Professor of Chemistry at the University of Michigan.

ST:  You’ve done much of your work on compounds called aryl amines. What exactly are these?

Aryl amines are compounds that contain an aromatic carbon-nitrogen bond. They’re very important compounds, present in a lot of biologically active molecules, pharmaceuticals, and so forth. They’re also found in chemicals widely used in agrochemistry, photography, xerography, and a host of other areas as well. The problem we’ve been addressing is that we’ve never had good, general methods for making these compounds. Certainly there are ways to do it, but most require fairly drastic conditions—harsh reaction conditions, for instance, that wouldn’t tolerate the kind of sensitive intermediates that you might encounter in pharmaceutical synthesis. Another problem we’ve wanted to address is that most of the available methodology for synthesizing these compounds is fairly limited in scope. A lot of reactions, for instance, suffer from serious side reactions that will give multiple products.

ST:  How did you approach the problem of finding a better method?

We had a couple of leads to suggest how to go about it that dated back to the early 1980s. One technique was developed by Migita’s lab in Japan and another by Dale Boger at Scripps. The idea was to try to come up with a more general way to do this work for a wide variety of different compounds and not have to use either toxic metals—tin is quite toxic, for example—or tremendous amounts of palladium. Palladium is the metal most effective at doing all the steps in a catalytic cycle, but it’s very expensive. The early studies in the Buchwald lab were carried out before I got there by a post-doc named Anil Guram. He first looked at ways to generalize this reaction with tin reagents, since the Migita technique only made a very narrow class of compounds. And in the course of his studies, Anil eventually found that if you just left tin out and used aromatic amine and did the reaction in the presence of a base, then the reaction would work. So Anil managed to get rid of the need to use tin, but there was still just a very narrow subset of compounds we could make with this chemical. We then set out to develop better palladium catalysts that would be able to handle a much wider range of substrates and make a much more diverse array of products.

ST:  What was the biggest challenge?

The biggest challenge was to somehow inhibit a competing side reaction called β-hydride elimination. Rather than forming the carbon-nitrogen bond you wanted, this would form a carbon-hydrogen bond. This was one factor limiting the yield. We needed to develop catalysts that would get around this process.

ST:  And how did you succeed?

Through a combination of mechanistic studies and empirical studies. And, as is usually the case, a little luck played a part as well.

ST:  What was the luck factor?

Well, the key discovery we made back in 1998 was that a ligand called BINAP turned out to be a very good ligand. This is a chiral bis-phosphene. It was developed by Ryoji Noyori, who used this ligand for hydrogenation chemistry and won the Nobel Prize for the work. BINAP was a ligand people usually used in asymmetric transformations. The serendipity came about by way of another graduate student in the laboratory, Seble Wagaw, who was trying to do something else entirely and realized that BINAP provided a reaction much more rapid and cleaner than anything we had seen previously.

ST:  How would you describe the overall significance of the work you did with the Buchwald lab, and your highly cited 1998 Journal of the American Chemical Society paper?

There are really two sets of significant points. For starters, these techniques we’ve come up with basically provide a very powerful method to form aromatic carbon-nitrogen bonds. This chemistry is being used both in academia as well as in industry to make a lot of compounds that were simply very difficult to make without it. For instance, Dick Schrock, who is also at MIT, used this chemistry to make a ligand for some of his metal complexes that he uses in reductions of molecular nitrogen to ammonia, and this chemistry has been used to make a number of natural products. So it is arguably the mildest method available for the formation of aromatic carbon nitrogen bonds.

The other area of impact of this work, the other focus, was on developing very active palladium catalysts to transform aromatic chlorides. It turns out aromatic chlorides are a lot cheaper than aromatic bromides or aromatic iodides. From the industrial standpoint, this is very useful. The problem was that, for a long time, people believed these aromatic chlorides were usually un-reactive in these kinds of palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. Maybe at temperatures over 130°C they’d work, but that was it. We were working on developing new palladium catalysts, and that led us to catalysts that can transform these very un-reactive aromatic chlorides under very mild conditions and even at room temperature in some cases.

ST:  How do you decide which journals you’ll submit your articles to?

Basically we want to submit our work to the highest-impact journals, to get the work out there and have it accessible to the maximum number of people who want to use it. Most of our important work we try to publish in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. If not there, we will go to Angewandte Chemie or the other American Chemical Society journals, such as the Journal of Organic Chemistry. We want to put our work in journals that reach the highest readership and the most people interested in using this chemistry.

ST:  How has your understanding of this chemistry evolved since you entered the field in the past decade?

First I would say we have a much greater mechanistic understanding of some of the steps in these reactions. All these metal-catalyzed reactions are not really one, but series of two, three, or four reactions in a catalytic cycle. The final step in that cycle, for either carbon-carbon bond formation or carbon-nitrogen bond formation is called reductive elimination. Over the course of the last nine or ten years, we learned a lot about how to facilitate the reductive elimination step in these catalytic cycles without slowing down the other steps. These catalytic reactions are a kind of complex balancing act. Sometimes it’s easy to figure out how to speed up one reaction out of three or four. The tricky part is to speed up one without messing up the others. In a lot of cases, the electronic parameters required for each reaction are different and can in fact be opposite, so when you speed up one you may slow down the others. I think we’ve made good strides forward in understanding these reactions, although people are still very active in this area.

Another issue has been controlling this β-hydride elimination reaction. Probably the most interesting development in the last few years in this area has been work out of Greg Fu’s lab at MIT showing that you can use alkyl halides in carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions catalyzed by palladium, providing you make the appropriate choice of catalyst.

ST:  Are you satisfied with what you’ve achieved?

"Satisfied" is a little bit of an extreme word. I am pleased with what I’ve achieved. One hopes, of course, to always keep on achieving.End

John P. Wolfe, Ph.D.
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, USA


Read a rankings profile of the journal Angewandte Chemie-International Edition in the special topic of Molecular Self-Assembly.

ESI Special Topics, June 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/aryl/interviews/JohnPWolfe.html

ESI Special Topic of:
"Aryl Halide Chemistry," Published May 2003

•> Search Special Topics
Aryl Halide Chemistry Menu || All Topics Menu ||
Interview Index
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.