Let's
begin at the beginning. How did you get started in diabetes research,
and why?
Way back in the early 1970s, we started the first community-based
prevention program for cardiovascular disease in Finland. While
doing it, of course, it was rather natural to pay some attention to
diabetes, which is very much linked to cardiovascular disease and is
part of a cluster of related disorders. At the time, however,
diabetes was much less common than it is nowadays. It was not
recognized as a major public health problem, although it was
recognized as an important disease to be treated as a clinical
entity and an important cardiovascular risk factor. After we did our
cardiovascular prevention program, I looked around a little to see
what we might be missing. This was the early 1980s when the
information available started to indicate that Finland has the
highest incidence of type 1
diabetes in the world. And that didn't have any explanation. It
still hasn't a full explanation. But it was a very interesting
finding and it generated a lot of research in this country,
including my own.
Is
that what prompted your review of the worldwide incidence of type 1
diabetes?
As I was working in the field of epidemiology, and with Finland
having the highest incidence of type 1 diabetes, I felt the need to
properly document how large the geographic differences in incidence
really are and what sort of variations we can see worldwide, or
within a smaller region like Northern Europe. So I, with my
colleagues, put together information that had been fragmented in a
lot of different places, and published them together in one article.
If the citations are any indication, there was quite obviously a
need for such a summary publication.
Did
you follow it up with further research?
In the early 1990s, we initiated a prospective study to look at
the changes in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world. In
1999 we published another paper in Diabetologia assessing the
trends in incidence over time. The original paper in 1994 had the
historical data, but a very limited analysis of what happened over
time. The 1999 paper contained the time trends, and demonstrated
that type 1 diabetes in children is actually increasing throughout
the world. Not only here, where the risk is high, but also in
very-low-incidence populations such as China and Latin America.
Also, my team has coordinated the pooling of the incidence studies
worldwide since 1990, including more than 100 populations.
And
what could explain that?
Obviously, it must be partially due to genetic factors and
partially due to environmental and lifestyle factors. Certainly
something in our environment triggers the disease, but there has to
be a genetic susceptibility as well. Without that, diabetes would
not develop. That's true for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Although it may sound difficult to understand, it looks like the
genetic susceptibility is largely responsible for the increase in
incidence of type 1 diabetes. Still, 80 years ago, type 1 diabetes
was a fatal disease, and insulin replacement therapy was the first
experience for human society when people with a fatal disease did
survive and reproduce, thus transmitting the susceptibility genes to
the next generation. Before insulin, the family line stopped there.
How
do you decide where to send your papers and why did this one go to Diabetologia?
In science, we always want to publish in so-called high-impact
journals. The impact factor that one gets from journals like Science
or the New England Journal of Medicine are high, but then
there are times when one simply wants to make the paper available to
the greatest number of researchers in the field. So that's when we
might go to a specialized journal like Diabetologia. Then
there are other issues: type 1 diabetes, for example, is a common
disease in Europe and therefore we would think a European journal
might be more appropriate for that kind of research.
Were
you surprised at the impact of the paper?
Not really. When I was planning the paper, I saw a clear need for
it. And so I'm not surprised that that need turned out to be real.
What
has to be done now to understand the problem and deal with it?
Regarding type 1 diabetes, we still need considerable research
about the role of genes. I think that is most important. We know
quite a bit about the susceptibility genes that are involved in the
disease process, but still we have to understand how the environment
and the genes interact to produce the disease, and then we have to
understand how to prevent it. There are some ongoing studies trying
to prevent type 1 diabetes, but I think they're still premature. We
need to know more before real prevention can be applied. As for type
2 diabetes, it's very clear that prevention through lifestyle
modification is the only way to go. And for that we published the
first randomized trial data in May 2001 in the New England
Journal of Medicine. We showed that lifestyle intervention
reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes in high-risk obese individuals
by 58%. This was confirmed recently in a U.S. trial, which also
demonstrated exactly 58% reduction in the risk of diabetes. The next
phase is to start programs nationwide.
What
lifestyle changes are important?
In principle it's very simple: avoid obesity; eat a balanced diet
with sufficient macronutrients, fibers, seafood, and healthy oils
like olive oil; avoid saturated fats. In addition, sufficient
physical activity is very important. Nowadays, what with cars,
televisions, and computers, nobody is moving, and that is a major
problem. Something needs to be done and something will be done, I'm
sure. We also have to do more research to understand the etiology of
type 2 diabetes. If we can understand the function of the
susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes and how the disease
actually develops, maybe we can use this information to predict who
will get the disease and to develop much earlier and more intensive
interventions and treatment.
What
do you consider the biggest single challenge in your research?
I think it's what we've just been talking about: to understand
how genes and the environment interact to produce type 1 and type 2
diabetes and the complications of diabetes. The disease is severe,
but the disease itself is not the big problem. In most patients it
can be treated with insulin or oral drugs. We can control diabetes
and glucose levels, and new means are coming. The problem is that
diabetics develop complications. Basically every organ in the body
is affected in the long run. There's heart disease, kidney disease,
nerve problems, visual problems, even psychological problems, etc.
These can be extremely severe, expensive to treat, and they can
shorten life. This is, of course, the biggest challenge. I believe
the only way to tackle the complications of diabetes is to prevent
the onset of the disease or postpone it so late that it doesn’t
really cause any major problem. If people don't get diabetes until
they're 75 or 80, then the complications don't have time to develop.
It may be that most of the genetically susceptible individuals will
eventually develop some degree of diabetes during their lifetime,
but the major challenge is to prevent the onset of the disease so we
can prevent the complications. For that, we have to understand how
the disease develops. This requires knowledge about the genes and
the interaction of the genes with the environment. That is, however,
a very hard thing to do. It's far more complicated than many
researchers and clinicians thought and it requires multidisciplinary
approaches.
Is
there a message you'd like to give to the general public about your
work?
In general, the most important message is that we have firm
evidence now that type 2 diabetes is a preventable disease. So the
future looks pretty good for the families at risk for the disease. I
think this is very good news and something I'd very much like to get
across to the public all over the world.
Jaakko Tuomilehto, M.D., M.Pol.Sc., Ph.D.
Academy Professor
National Public Health Institute
Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit
Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion
And Department of Public Health
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland