|
From
•>>August 2003
Steven T. DeKosky answers
a few questions about this month's emerging research front
in
field of Neuroscience & Behavior: Neuroscience & Behavior
Article: "Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review) - Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology"
Author: Petersen, RC;Stevens, JC;Ganguli, M;Tangalos, EG;Cummings,
JL;DeKosky, ST
Journal: NEUROLOGY, 56: (9) 1133-1142, MAY 8 2001
Addresses:
Amer Acad Neurol, Qual Stand Subcomm, 1080 Montreal Ave, St Paul, MN 55116 USA.
Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN USA.
Lutheran Med Off, Ft Wayne, IN USA.
Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA.
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA.
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA.
|
|

Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Early diagnosis and intervention in Alzheimer’s disease is an
important target for researchers and clinicians, since it may lead
to better outcomes, new interventions, as well as more time to learn
about the disease and prepare for significant life changes. This has
led to new research studies attempting earlier detection of
cognitive decline in late life. The early changes are termed
"mild cognitive impairment," or MCI. This concept has
caught the interest of the dementia research community and also has
the interest of practicing neurologists, primary care physicians,
and psychiatrists who see such patients.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that’s useful to
others?
With an emphasis on early intervention so that medications may
have greater impact, identifying people very early with cognitive
decline or people who are at risk becomes increasingly important.
The early diagnostic assessments were not focused on sensitivity to
detect the earliest manifestations. New studies looking at
people who had been followed in longitudinal population studies and
developed dementia, or studies of people who became mildly memory
impaired and who evolved over time into full-blown dementia, have
been the basis for our new understanding. Data suggests that people
who develop a relatively isolated memory disorder can evolve into
full-blown Alzheimer’s disease at the rate of 10 to 15% per year,
quite above the equal age-associated rate of 1 to 2% per year.
Obviously we would want to identify these people. A particularly
active area of research focuses on the earliest changes that can be
identified on cognitive assessment or on scans such as MRI or PET.
Our paper on MCI was important because it was part of an
evidence-based search of the literature to provide the best
practices for diagnosis (Knopman, et al., same issue) and
treatment (Doody, et al., same issue) of dementia, organized
by the Practice Parameters Subcommittee of the American Academy of
Neurology (AAN). Papers to be included in the analysis had to meet
certain standards of evidence. This particular document, on MCI, was
intended to inform physicians of an advancing field that
would probably have a significant impact on the way they practice,
and to some extent to set an agenda for how we do research on early
cases.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
In layman’s terms, this paper outlines the issues and the data
supporting our ability to identify, much earlier than previously,
the memory and thinking changes that will eventually develop into
Alzheimer’s disease. With current and [hopefully] more-powerful
future therapies, identifying these people sooner will likely make
their treatments more effective. For the present, the ability to
alert physicians to the patterns of cognitive impairment that don’t
meet the criteria for dementia but do represent its early signs will
enable them to monitor such patients closely and intervene as soon
as it is deemed appropriate.
How
did you become involved in this research?
My involvement in this research stems from my clinical and basic
research in Alzheimer’s disease over the past 25 years. This
particular project was the result of a great deal of work by a very
diligent group of investigators in Alzheimer’s disease, comprising
neurologists, geriatric psychiatrists, geriatricians, and other
researchers (please see the list of authors for this paper).
I co-chaired, with Dr. Jeffrey Cummings, the Dementia Practice
Parameters Committee that did the literature search and the
individual evaluations of all papers that evaluated mild cognitive
impairment and its outcomes. Many of the members of this committee,
including myself, had been involved in the evaluation of patients
with MCI who had presented to a clinic, as well as in following
patients in epidemiological long-term studies and observing the
decline in memory function and other cognitive domains that
eventually led to manifest Alzheimer’s disease. In the course of
trying to identify both the earliest clinical and biological changes
that occur in people who are going to develop Alzheimer’s disease,
I and many colleagues have been increasingly led to study MCI and
people who are at risk for developing dementia, in an effort to
facilitate efforts to blunt the effect of the coming epidemic in
Alzheimer’s disease and other late-life dementias.
Steven T. DeKosky, M.D.
Professor and Chairman
Department of Neurology
Director, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Return to Emerging Research Fronts | Return
to Special Topics main menu
|