|
From
•>>June 2004
[late
entry]
Todd Braver answers
a few questions about this month's emerging research front
in
field of Neuroscience & Behavior: Neuroscience & Behavior
Article: Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence
Authors: Gray, JR;Chabris, CF;Braver, TS
Journal: NAT NEUROSCI, 6: (3) 316-322, MAR 2003
Addresses: Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Campus Box 1125, St Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
|
|

Why do you think your
paper is highly cited?
|

“...we decided to carry out a rather large scale brain-imaging study to enable us to examine both cognitive individual differences and those relating to affective differences as well”
|
|
In general, cognitive neuroscientists are beginning to become
quite interested in individual differences. Human intelligence—in
the sense of reasoning and problem-solving ability, or fluid
intelligence—is a major dimension of individual differences, and
the neurobiological mechanisms are not only intriguing but also
currently poorly understood. Our study also contained several
methodological advances over previous work.
Does it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's
useful to others?
The paper was the first to use the variability of fluid
intelligence within a large sample of individuals (48) to identify
brain regions that might support fluid intelligence, namely the
lateral prefrontal and lateral parietal cortex. Our study went
beyond identifying which areas are important, by indicating the
specific cognitive conditions in which these areas seem to be most
critical. These conditions appear to be ones where information has
to be kept actively in mind and also protected against sources of
interference. Previous neuroimaging studies had either used small
samples, or had compared harder against easier tasks. In addition,
we used multivariate methods (specifically, path analysis) to
formally test whether specific brain regions could mediate the
relation between higher intelligence and better task performance.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's
terms?
We found that individual differences in fluid intelligence (or
reasoning and novel problem-solving ability) are mediated by brain
areas that help control attention. Individual differences matter
greatly in everyday life, including education, employment, and
health. Cognitive neuroscientists are increasingly interested in the
brain bases of individual differences, and in particular the
challenges and rewards of studying why and how individuals vary in
thinking-style and ability.
How did you become involved in this research?
We became interested in how individual differences in mental
functioning might contribute to the ability to exert control over
thoughts and actions. Our previous work had indicated that the brain
regions involved in these self-control functions were modulated by
emotional states and by individual differences in emotional
reactivity. We hypothesized that individual differences in cognitive
functions were also likely to be critical. Consequently, we decided
to carry out a rather large scale brain-imaging study to enable us
to examine both cognitive individual differences and those relating
to affective differences as well. Our goals for the future will be
to determine whether individual differences in cognitive abilities,
such as fluid intelligence, directly interact with individual
differences in emotional reactivity in terms of impacting the
engagement of brain regions involved with self-control functions.
Todd S. Braver, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Washington University
St. Louis, MO, USA
Jeremy R. Gray, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, USA
|
Return to Emerging Research Fronts | Return
to Special Topics main menu
|