|
From
•>>October 2005
Andrea Romanino answers
a few questions about this month's emerging research front
in
field of Physics: Physics
Article: Split supersymmetry
Authors: Giudice, GF;Romanino, A
Journal: NUCL PHYS B, 699 (1-2): 65-89, NOV 1 2004
Addresses:
CERN, Div Theory, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland.
CERN, Div Theory, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland.
|
|

Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
|

“The "Split Supersymmetry" framework emerges as a most economical and compelling option from an analysis of the constraints set by the two evidences above on the physics across the energy
frontier.”
|
|
Understanding the fundamental laws of nature at energy
scales across the present frontier of accelerator experiments
is one of the most intriguing problems in particle physics.
Our paper uses a new approach to the theoretical investigation
of this issue. While the previous investigations used the
Higgs mass hierarchy problem as the main (theoretical)
guideline, we concentrate instead on established experimental
evidences. In our approach, the hierarchy problem is assumed
not to be directly relevant to the physics across the energy
frontier.
Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology
that's useful to others?
As mentioned above, our method consists in using two important experimental evidences as guidelines for the theoretical investigation of the physics across the energy frontier. The first one is the increasing evidence that almost 1/3 of our universe is made of "dark
matter," a mysterious and probably new form of matter that cannot be directly observed because it is not luminous. The second evidence we use is that three out of the four known fundamental forces unify. “Split supersymmetry” emerges from an analysis of the constraints set by the two evidences above.
The results of our
approach reinforce the previous results by Nima
Arkani-Hamed and Savas
Dimopoulos in hep-th/0405159
[1]. Our approach assumes that the Higgs mass hierarchy
problem is solved by a principle that has no direct
consequences on the physics probed by accelerator experiments.
This is analogous to what appears to be the case for another
hierarchy problem, the one associated to the cosmological
constant. In fact, the two problems might even have a common
"anthropic" solution, which motivated the approach
described in [1]. Such a possibility leads to another drastic
change of perspective and methodology in our approach to
fundamental problems, with the emphasis shifting from
dynamical to statistical principles. It also makes a
connection with recent developments in string theory.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman's terms?
Split supersymmetry is a motivated guess on what we will
find in a world yet to be discovered. Particle physics aims at
understanding the laws of physics underlying the structure of
our universe at a more and more fundamental level. Our deepest
understanding is at present summarized by an extremely
successful synthesis called the "standard model,"
which appears to hold, even down to the smallest subatomic
world we have ever probed. However, there are compelling
reasons to believe that we are missing an even deeper level of
understanding, associated with physics hiding at even smaller
scales. Theoretical speculations on the new world waiting for
us at those scales have been going on for decades. However,
the ultimate answer in science comes from the experiments to
be undertaken—in our case from those ones that will be
performed at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. Like a
giant, incredibly powerful microscope, this impressive machine
will be able, in a few years, to explore the world of smaller
scales. As mentioned, split supersymmetry is a theoretical
guess on what is waiting for us in that world. The guess is
based on some hints that nature has offered us. Such hints,
unlike the ones pursued by previous speculations, are entirely
based on the results of experiments. More specifically, our
guess is that the particles living in that world play a major
role in two of the most fascinating puzzles of fundamental
physics. The first one is the nature of "dark
matter," a mysterious form of non-luminous matter that
appears to constitute most of the matter in the universe. The
second one is the existence of a unifying principle accounting
for at least three of the four basic forces of nature.
Previous speculations had mostly been based on another
important, purely theoretical hint: the need for a solution of
the so called "hierarchy problem." This problem is
related to the fact that the ultimate understanding of
gravity, the force arising between masses, seems to be
associated at scales that are by far (hierarchically) smaller
than the scales at which the known particles get a mass. This
seems unnatural from a theoretical point of view. In the
context of split supersymmetry, this puzzle is not directly
relevant to the world that will be explored by the LHC. On the
contrary, its solution might require a drastic change of
perspective, in which the hierarchy is as accidental as the
fact that we live on a planet which satisfies the highly
non-trivial conditions necessary for life to develop.
How did you become involved in this research?
At the beginning of 2004, together with my colleague Gian
Giudice, we considered the possibility of putting aside the
paradigm that had dominated the theoretical speculations on
the nature of the physics beyond the "standard
model" in the last couple of decades. The idea was to
study the constraints on new physics following uniquely from
the requirement of a successful gauge coupling unification. We
immediately started investigating this possibility and came up
with a few interesting results. However, it was only after the
seminal paper of Arkani-Hamed and Dimopoulos in May, 2005,
that we started systematically pursuing our approach and
obtained the main results of our paper, which turned out to
reinforce and provide independent motivations for their work.
We then joined forces to perform a detailed study of some
theoretical and phenomenological aspects of the split-supersymmetry
scenario.
If applicable, what are the social or political
implications of your research?
The past has taught us that it is always difficult to
imagine the consequences of scientific research on the laws of
nature at their most fundamental level. Surely, the effort
that will lead to the experimental investigation of the new
world on which the theoretical community is speculating is
having a crucial impact on the development of new
technologies, with clear consequences to the economy and
everyday life. It suffices to note the progress in computing
infrastructure which, after the clamorous World-Wide Web
revolution, now promises to lead to important advances in the
"grid" technology. Or to consider the progress made
in superconducting magnets and criogenics, which will lead to
the creation of the coldest massive object in the universe
(the LHC).
Andrea Romanino
Associate Professor
SISSA/ISAS (International School for Advanced Studies)
Trieste, Italy
|
Return to Emerging Research Fronts | Return
to Special Topics main menu
|