The paper yields a comprehensive, almost exhaustive,
database analysis of toxin-antitoxin genes from Prokaryotes
(Bacteria and Archaea). The toxin genes of the known seven
toxin-antitoxin (TA) gene families encode highly efficient
inhibitors of cell growth. Most of the known toxins inhibit
translation by a unique mechanism: they cleave mRNA positioned
at the ribosomal A site and thereby block translation.
|

“I like to compare toxin - antitoxin genes with gears on a bike...”
|
|
One enzyme, e.g., RelE, can cleave many mRNAs and thereby
clog the translation apparatus very efficiently. Thus, the
toxins encoded by TA genes are very efficient inhibitors of
bacterial cell growth, including pathogenic bacteria.
The paper represents an enormous amount of database work—gene
mining in the DNA databases. Via this comprehensive, almost
exhaustive work, we elucidated a striking and unusual
phylogenetic (evolutionary) pattern, and reached the
incontrovertible conclusion that the seven known
toxin-antitoxin gene families are abundant (almost ubiquitous)
in free-living prokaryotes but virtually absent from obligate
intracellular bacteria.
This is an important observation that points to the
conclusion that free-living bacteria that encounter
nutritional stress in changing environments benefit from
having toxin-antitoxin genes. Moreover, we show that the
toxin-antitoxin gene families have very complex phylogenetic
patterns unlike any other known gene family.
Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology
that's useful to others?
This work puts a lot of genes (2 x 671) from 126 organisms
into their right functional and phylogenetic context, and is
therefore highly useful for the scientific community. We
developed a novel method to exhaustively search for
toxin-antitoxin genes in prokaryotic genomes. This method may
be useful in other cases as well.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman’s terms?
We have found a large number of new genes in Bacteria (and
Archaea) that, when activated, can kill or stop the growth of
the organisms in which they reside. So, either bacteria can
kill themselves (some bacterial groups work to prove this
"suicide" hypothesis) or bacteria benefit from
having a large number of regulators that coordinate the speed
of cell growth to nutrients in the environment—that is the
theory that we have proposed and found experimental evidence
to support.
I like to compare toxin-antitoxin genes with gears on a
bike. Lance Armstrong needs many gears to adjust the speed
when he encounters the steep uphill increment in certain
mountains. Thus, one of the most slowly growing pathogens, Mycobacterium
tuberculosis, has 60 TA gene pairs, an almost unreal
number (Mycobacterium leprae, an obligatory
intracellular pathogen, has none, even though the M. leprae
genome was derived from that of M. tuberculosis
by reductive evolution).
How did you become involved in this research, and were
there successes or failures along the way?
Many of my peers consider me as one of the pioneers of the
toxin-antitoxin field. Way back in 1986, we published a unique
antisense RNA-regulated mechanism that confers so-called
"postsegregational killing" of bacteria, a term that
I invented when I was writing my Ph.D. thesis. During the ’80s
and ’90s, my group unraveled a beautiful and complex RNA
folding mechanism controlled both by an antisense RNA and the
folding pathway of the mRNA that is the target of the
antisense RNA.
It's probably still the best-described regulatory mRNA
folding pathway known. I stopped working with antisense RNAs
since many of the general journals thought that our work was
too esoteric. We encountered several depressing rejections of
manuscripts describing highly sophisticated RNA
"gymnastics." Therefore, I switched to the other
type of toxin-antitoxin loci in which the toxins are
counteracted, not by antisense RNAs, but by protein
regulators.
We could rapidly see that this was also an exciting and
fertile research field since toxin-antitoxin genes are
ubiquitous in all Archaea and in all free-living Bacteria (but
perhaps not as sexy as antisense RNA-regulated
"killer" toxins).
Obviously the exhaustive mining and accurate annotation of
618 gene loci (2 x 618 genes) in 118 genomes was a
frustratingly big task. Several times during the two and a
half years that it took, we thought that we had them all.
However, new branches kept popping up. But the new method that
we developed made it easier and we now have exhaustively mined
and accurately annotated 1,240 toxin-antitoxin loci in 218
prokaryotic genomes together with all plasmids in the National
Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database.
If applicable, what are the social or political
implications of your research?
We have described that a significant fraction of highly
pathogenic bacteria have many toxin-antitoxin loci that, when
activated, can kill the harmful invaders—e.g., Mycobacterium
tuberculosis has sixty (60!) toxin-antitoxin loci.
Several, or perhaps many, groups are now working towards
developing toxin-antitoxin genes in pathogenic bacteria as
promising targets in the development of drugs aimed at
eradicating persistent infections.
Kenn Gerdes, Professor
Chief Investigator: Kenn Gerdes Research Group
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
University of Southern Denmark
Odense, Denmark
And
Visiting Professor
Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences
The Medical School
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK