This paper defines, for the first time, the molecular
signals that are expressed in Spemann’s Organizer and
required for its function.
|

“...which side of the embryo will become the back? Which side will become the head?”
|
|
The Organizer experiment was a critical one in the history
of developmental biology—Nature Milestones
Development lists it as the first milestone. Nevertheless, our
understanding of the molecular signals that are required for
Organizer function was still uncertain.
One of the candidate signals of the Organizer, BMP
antagonism, had not appeared to be a required signal based on
mouse, zebrafish, and Xenopus loss-of-function studies.
We showed, for the first time, that the loss of three BMP
antagonists was required to eliminate Organizer function, thus
cementing the importance of BMP antagonists in Organizer
function.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman's terms?
The fertilized egg has a simple structure, but develops
into a complex animal. During development of the fertilized
egg, the dividing cells become specialized in response to
cell-cell communication between different parts of the embryo.
An early and critical step is the signal that defines the
different sides of the embryo. For example, which side of the
embryo will become the back? Which side will become the head?
In 1924, the German Embryologists Hans Spemann (1869-1941)
and Hilde Mangold (1898-1924) identified a region of the
embryo that produced signals that defined where the head and
back should form. They called this region "the
organizer."
Spemann was a professor of zoology (1919–35) at the
University of Freiburg. By transplanting embryonic tissue to a
new location or to another embryo, he investigated the agency
that governs the growth and differentiation of cells. He
received the 1935 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for
"the organizer effect," and three years later
described his award-winning research in his classic text, Embryonic
Development and Induction (1938).
Previously, we and others had shown that a class of
molecules that block a specific cell-to-cell communication
pathway could mimic the function of the Organizer. These BMP
antagonists were therefore candidates for the Organizer
signal.
In our paper, we show that these were indeed the required
signal from the Organizer which instructs the cells to become
back and head. Without these signals, only belly structures
form. Therefore, for the first time, we identified the
required signal from the Organizer—something for which
developmental biologists have been searching for over 80
years.
How did you become involved in this research, and were
any problems encountered along the way?
I have had an interest in the molecular signals in Spemann’s
Organizer for over 20 years. It has captured the attention of
a great many developmental biologists and remains a
fascinating problem.
Although we had multiple candidate molecules in hand, the
loss-of-function experiments had not proven that the BMP
antagonists were required in normal development. We therefore
needed to block the function of multiple genes simultaneously,
in a manner that would still be specific to each gene.
Therefore, for these experiments, we used an emerging model
system, Xenopus tropicalis, a close cousin of the
widely used Xenopus laevis. X. tropicalis has a
much simpler genome than X. laevis, and this allowed us
to design function-blocking oligonucleotides to knock down
expression of multiple genes.
Richard Harland, Ph.D.
C.H. Li Distinguished Professor and Chair,
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of California, Berkeley
Department of Molecular & Cell Biology
Berkeley, CA, USA