|

“The article describes a laboratory procedure which can be used for assessing the risks of transgenic plants on non-target organisms.”
|
|
The introduction of transgenic plants in crop production
has lead to much political and social controversy. One major
concern has been whether transgenic plants are a risk to the
environment. Previous publications had claimed negative
effects of transgenic insect-resistant plants on beneficial
insects in laboratory experiments but not in the field. Most
likely this paper is highly cited given the comprehensive and
stepwise testing procedure which was used in order to
determine whether plants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis
pose a risk on an important predatory insect found in maize
fields.
Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology
that's useful to others?
The article describes a laboratory procedure which can be
used for assessing the risks of transgenic plants on
non-target organisms. Although it provided no new discovery,
it gives a holistic perspective on how to design and conduct
risks assessment tests in the laboratory in order to gain
enough meaningful information for deciding whether higher tier
tests in the field are required.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman's terms?
Since 1996, insect-resistant transgenic crops expressing
genes from Bacillus thuringiensis have been released
into the field. The continuous expression of the insecticidal
protein (Bt-toxin) in most plant tissues and throughout the
growing season has raised concerns about the possible impact
on insects that are not the target pest in the crop. In the
study we investigated the effects of Bt-maize on three
herbivores insects commonly found in a maize field that feed
directly on the plant together with a third trophic organism,
namely a predatory beneficial insect, that preys on these
herbivores. By quantifying the amount of Bt-toxin found in
each organism it was possible to determine the potential
exposure of the organisms to the insecticidal protein. We
found that exposure to the toxin varies according to the
different feeding behaviors of the herbivore insects. Although
the third trophic level predatory insect is potentially
exposed to the Bt-toxin, no direct toxic effects were
observed. This easy laboratory testing procedure can be used
as a tool for predicting whether transgenic plants in the
field could potentially have adverse effects on non-target
organisms.
How did you become involved in this research?
I was hired as a Postdoc in 2000 at the Swiss Federal
Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture (Agroscope
FAL Reckenholz) where work on the risks of transgenic plants
had been ongoing since the introduction of the technology into
agricultural fields. The institute was one of the first to
work in this area and since then has taken the lead on
establishing methods and guidelines that are used in the risk
assessment of transgenic plants.
If applicable, what are the social or political
implications of your research?
This area of research has very important social and
political implications as the use of transgenic plants has
been restricted to only some areas of the globe, and the
debate on whether they should be released in other areas is
still ongoing. Establishing guidelines and conducting risk
assessment research is necessary for providing the public with
transparent information. Providing scientifically sound
information to the layman is essential, given that this
technology has been often portrayed as negative and harmful to
the environment. A comparison between transgenic plants and
the commonly accepted agricultural pest control methods is a
requirement, in order that we can best judge if transgenic
plants are more or less harmful to the environment.
Anna Dutton
Syngenta Crop Protection
Research Biology
Stein, Switzerland