|
From
•>>October 2006
Igor Belyakov answers a
few questions about this month's emerging research front in
the field of Microbiology.
Microbiology
Article: Shared modes of protection against poxvirus infection by attenuated and conventional smallpox vaccine viruses
Authors: Belyakov,
IM;Earl, P;Dzutsev, A;Kuznetsov, VA;Lemon, M;Wyatt, LS;Snyder, JT;Ahlers, JD;Franchini, G;Moss, B;Berzofsky, JA
Journal: PROC NAT ACAD SCI USA, 100 (16): 9458-9463 AUG 5 2003
Addresses:
NCI, Mol Immunogenet & Vaccine Res Sect, Metab Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
NCI, Mol Immunogenet & Vaccine Res Sect, Metab Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
NCI, Basic Res Labs, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
NIAID, Viral Dis Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
NICHHD, Lab Integrat & Med Biophys, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
 |
| • |
January
1, 2008:
This paper has also been named the Fast Moving Front
paper in
Microbiology for
January 2008. |
|
|

Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
The mechanism of immune protection is poorly understood, in
part because immunology was in its infancy when smallpox was
eradicated by the widespread application of the Dryvax®
vaccine. Dryvax®, the vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine
currently licensed in the United States, is a lyophilized,
live-virus preparation of infectious vaccinia virus. Vaccinia
vaccine does not contain smallpox (variola) virus.
Vaccinations against the disease have not been required in the
United States since 1972.
|

“This study provides a better understanding of the mechanism of vaccine protection against vaccinia virus infection and may provide insights for further vaccine developments against smallpox.”
|
|
Both virus-specific antibody and CD8 CTL have been thought
to play a role in protection against orthopoxviruses. However,
the mechanism of protection against pathogenic vaccinia virus
has not been systematically studied by currently available
techniques. The licensed smallpox vaccine, Dryvax®,
can be considered very risky to immunize the population that
is immunocompromised by AIDS, chemotherapy for cancer, or
immunosuppression following organ transplant. Therefore, a
second-generation smallpox vaccine is needed. The urgency for
development of a new, more effective vaccine against smallpox
is increased today because of concern about bioterrorism.
In this study, we demonstrated that neither CD4 nor CD8
effector T cells were necessary or sufficient to protect mice
against pathogenic vaccinia virus, whereas an antibody
response—which depends on CD4+ Thelp for its induction—was
sufficient. Vaccinia-specific CD4 and CD8 cells prevented
mortality of infected immunized mice. T cell immunity was
important for natural resistance against poxvirus in naïve
mice. We discovered that the same types of responses
contributed to protection by both modified vaccinia Ankara
(replication-deficient vaccinia) and licensed Wyeth strains of
vaccinia virus, making comparison of these by surrogate immune
response markers feasible.
Our paper is highly cited because this study can help in
the development of a better vaccine against smallpox, and, in
particular, provide a basis for further evaluation of
replication-deficient vaccinia viruses as safer vaccines
against smallpox. Our work helped resolved a contentious
issue, namely what immune mechanisms are important for
protection against pathogenic vaccinia.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or
synthesis of knowledge?
This study provides a better understanding of the mechanism
of vaccine protection against vaccinia virus infection and may
provide insights for further vaccine developments against
smallpox.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman’s terms?
This paper describes the importance of different immune
mechanisms for protection against poxviruses (including
smallpox) in immunized and unimmunized animals. We
demonstrated that, at sufficient doses, protection can be
provided by attenuated vaccinia virus as well.
How did you become involved in this research, and were
there any obstacles along the way?
Our interest in viral immunology is longstanding. However,
this study was possible because of our collaboration with Dr.
Bernard Moss and his lab (Lab of Viral Diseases, NIAID, NIH,
DHHS).
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
Yes, primarily because of national and international
concerns about bioterrorism.
Igor M. Belyakov, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.
Senior Staff Scientist, Vaccine Branch, CCR
National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS
Bethesda, MD, USA
|
Return to Emerging Research Fronts | Return
to Special Topics main menu
|