|

Why do you think your
paper is highly cited?
This is an extensive review on a novel approach to
dealing with highly complex, multicomponent systems, which
is broadly called "coarse graining of microscopic degrees of
freedom." It offers a very powerful possibility to reduce
the complexity of the theoretical treatment of a very large
class of materials and make their study manageable and
transparent, also allowing direct contact with experiments.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
“This is an extensive review on a novel
approach to dealing with highly complex, multicomponent systems,
which is broadly called 'coarse graining of microscopic degrees
of freedom'.” |
|
|
|
|
The review covers a large variety of systems, going from
a pedagogical level to cutting-edge research. I assume that
people have learned something by reading it and it gives me
great pleasure that people cite it heavily. If beginning
graduate students, for instance, have the feeling that the
article makes their going into research more palatable, I
would be very glad—this would mean I did my job well.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or
synthesis of knowledge?
In my opinion, the article offers a detailed description
of the above-mentioned coarse-graining strategy in many
different contexts. It also describes a host of new
discoveries on the particularities of the so-called "ultrasoft
colloids," that is, systems whose constituent particles are
penetrable (e.g., polymers, polyelectrolytes, etc.)
Would you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman’s terms?
I would say that the article has helped bring forward the
significance of certain theoretical approaches, their power,
and their broad range of applicability. It might also have
helped a bit in making people realize the meaning of a
statement by the pioneer of Soft Matter Science, the late
Pierre Gilles de Gennes—a recipient of the Nobel Prize in
Physics in 1991—who once said that complex fluids need not
necessarily be complicated fluids.
How did you become involved in this research and were any
particular problems encountered along the way?
My involvement with Soft Matter began during my Ph.D.
studies, when I worked on the study of classical fluids with
Professor Neil Ashcroft at Cornell University. It was
intensified during my postdoctoral stay in Juelich, where I
worked on star polymers and since then, there has been no
looking back.
The particular problems pertained rather to a translation
of terminology, expertise, language, and methods from
chemistry or physical chemistry—the traditional
"strongholds" of Soft Matter—into Physics. But other
scientists had already paved the way before me—Pierre Gilles
de Gennes, being one example of many. So, these problems
were not insurmountable ones.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
I see it leading to the discovery of novel forms of
self-organization of soft matter, in particular, under the
influence of external fields, to which soft systems react
very sensitively.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
It would be far-fetched to make such claims. The
implications of the fundamental research, which is what I am
doing, for society, are not immediate but rather very
indirect. But the skills one acquires by working in this
field are manifold and my graduate students can obtain very
attractive jobs, be they in scientific research or in
industry, and I am very glad of that.
Prof. Dr. Christos N. Likos
Institut für Theoretische Physik II
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany |