|

Why do you think your
paper is highly cited?
The paper reviews the most recent advances in the field
of adoptive immunotherapy of cancer, a procedure consisting
of the generation and expansion of anti-tumor immune cells
ex vivo prior to their transfer into the
tumor-bearing host.
 |
 |
|
“The paper reviews the most recent
advances in the field of adoptive
immunotherapy of cancer, a procedure
consisting of the generation and expansion
of anti-tumor immune cells ex vivo prior to
their transfer into the tumor bearing host.” |
|
Adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells has emerged
as the most potent treatment for patients affected by
metastatic melanoma refractory to standard treatments
including chemotherapy, radiation, and cytokine therapies.
There is high expectation that such a strategy might be
applied with success to common malignancies including lung,
breast, and colon cancer.
Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology
that’s useful to others?
In this review paper we elucidate the biology of adoptive
cell transfer-based immunotherapies. We describe the
importance of eliminating the negative influences of immune
cells such as regulatory T cells, cellular "sinks" for
activating cytokines, and myeloid suppressor cells prior to
the transfer.
We also review recent evidence that indicates that the
quality most associated with the effectiveness of T cells is
their "youth," specifically their lack of terminal
differentiation into cytotoxic T cells. Finally, we discuss
how these new findings might guide the rational design of
the next generation of adoptive cell-based therapies.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman’s terms?
This paper describes the biology behind two
counter-intuitive findings: 1) the elimination the host’s
immune system augments immunotherapy, and 2) highly
differentiated cytotoxic T cells are less effective in
mediating tumor regression compared to younger non-cytolytic
T cells.
How did you become involved in this research and were
there successes or failures?
The prospect of employing a patient’s immune system to
treat cancer has been the source of much hope and promise.
Initially, we were primarily driven by the goal of
developing a therapeutic cancer vaccine. However, like other
workers in the field of tumor immunology, we have been
unsuccessful in creating therapeutic cancer vaccines that
are effective in more than a small minority of patients
treated.
In our cancer vaccine trials of 440 patients, we have
observed a disappointing 2.6% of objective response rate. We
do not know the reasons for this lack of efficacy but cancer
vaccines might be limited by the low frequencies of
tumor-specific T cells and perhaps, more importantly, by the
presence of many redundant negative influences of the host
immune system and tumor microenvironment.
These hurdles, however, can be overcome by the use of
adoptive cell-based immunotherapies. T cells can be expanded
to large numbers and selected for tumor reactivity ex
vivo. More importantly, adoptive cell-based therapies
allow for manipulating the host before cell transfer to
alter the environment without harming the tumor reactive
immune cells.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
Tumor-specific T cells can rarely be raised from tumor
histologies other than melanoma. Therefore, our work will be
focused on imparting tumor specificity to open repertoire
peripheral blood lymphocytes through a gene engineering
approach.
Tumor reactivity can be conferred to non-reactive T cells
by using retroviral vectors encoding tumor-specific T cell
receptors (TCR), or chimeric receptors with antibody
specificity (T-bodies). This strategy not only permits
treatment of patients with any malignancy for which a
tumor-specific TCR can be cloned, but it also offers the
opportunity to select or induce T cells with the best
anti-tumor function.
In addition, we are currently developing stronger and
more selective approaches to lymphodepletion aimed at
eliminating the toxicities associated with the use of
non-specific preconditioning regimens based on chemotherapy
and radiation.
Are there any social or political implications of your
research?
The development of effective anti-tumor therapies can
have significant social impact. Cancer is one of the leading
causes of mortality in western countries. In addition,
adoptive immunotherapy might be used in the future for the
treatment of chronic infectious diseases.
Luca Gattinoni
Center for Cancer Research
National Cancer Institute
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD, USA
Nicholas P. Restifo
Center for Cancer Research
National Cancer Institute
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD, USA |