Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

Fast Breaking Comments

By Curt D. Furberg

ESI Special Topics, August 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2003/august03-CurtDFurberg.html

Curt D. Furberg answers a few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of Clinical Medicine.


From •>>August 2003

Field: Clinical Medicine
Article Title: "Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic - The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)"
Authors: Furberg, CD;Wright, JT;Davis, BR;Cutler, JA;Alderman, M;Black, H;Cushman, W;Grimm, R;Haywood, LJ;Leenen, F;Oparil, S;Probstfield, J;Whelton, P;Nwachuku, C;Gordon, D;Proschan, M;Einhorn, P;Ford, CE;Piller, LB;Dunn, JK;Goff, D;Pressel, S;Bettencourt, J;deLeon, B;Simpson, LM;Blanton, J;Geraci, T;Walsh, SM;Nelson, C;Rahman, M;Juratovac, A;Pospisil, R;Carroll, L;Sullivan, S;Russo, J;Barone, G;Christian, R;Feldman, S;Lucente, T;Calhoun, D;Jenkins, K;McDowell, P;Johnson, J;Kingry, C;Alzate, J;Margolis, KL;Holland-Klemme, LA;Jaeger, B;Williamson, J;Louis, G;Ragusa, P;Williard, A;Ferguson, RLS;Tanner, J;Eckfeldt, J;Crow, R;Pelosi, J
Journal: JAMA-J AM MED ASSN
Volume: 288
Page: 2981-2997
Year: DEC 18 2002
* Case Western Reserve Univ, Gen Clin Res Ctr, Suite 7311, Horvitz Tower, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.
* Case Western Reserve Univ, Gen Clin Res Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

Treated patients who are not receiving a diuretic alone or in combination with another drug should ask their physicians one very important question—why?

In the 1970s and 1980s it was established that lowering elevated blood pressure (BP) reduced the often devastating cardiovascular complications of hypertension. A large number of anti-hypertensive agents are now on the market. In addition to their BP-lowering potential, these drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, which might add to or subtract from the benefit of BP lowering per se. The most important question today in the field of hypertension is, "Does it matter which antihypertensive drug is prescribed?" In addition to potential differences between these drugs in terms of health benefits to patients, their costs vary up to 20-fold. Thus, ALLHAT adressed very important questions from clinical, scientific and societal perspectives.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that’s useful to others?

ALLHAT documented that a generic diuretic (chlorthalidone) compared with branded newer drugs, a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) and an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril), was unsurpassed in terms of BP lowering and drug compliance over five years and, in addition, was superior to the 10 to 20 times more expensive newer drugs in reducing one or more of the cardiovascular complications. Thus, ALLHAT confirmed that the costly new agents offered "no added value." This finding has major implications for patients and for payers of prescription drugs.

ST:  Can you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?

ALLHAT showed that older and much less expensive drugs for the treatment of high BP (diuretics or so-called water pills) are more effective than the newer more expensive ones. Therefore, a diuretic should be the first-line drug for the treatment of most patients with hypertension and be a part of most drug combinations. Treated patients who are not receiving a diuretic alone or in combination with another drug should ask their physicians one very important question—why?

ST:  How did you become involved in this research?

I became involved in this research due to my interest in public health. Hypertension is one of the most important public health issues in the US today—affecting about 60 million people nationwide. On the one hand, there is an enormous undertreatment of hypertension. On the other hand, there is a massive overutilization of costly antihypertensive drugs that in fact offer no real added value to the treatment of hypertension. We will all need to work together if we are to both reduce the risks to good health as well as the financial burden attached to the treatment for hypertension.End

Curt D. Furberg, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Public Health Sciences
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, NC, USA

ESI Special Topics, August 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2003/august03-CurtDFurberg.html

•> Search Special Topics
Fast Breaking Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
Fast Breaking Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.