By Kevin Omland
ESI Special Topics,
April 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/april05-KevinOmland.html
|
Kevin Omland answers a
few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Environment/Ecology.
From
•>>April 2005
Field:
Environment/Ecology
Article Title: Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA
Authors: Funk,
DJ;Omland, KE
Journal: ANNU REV ECOL EVOL SYST
Volume: 34:
Page: 397-423
Year: 2003
* Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Sci Biol, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.
* Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.
* Univ Maryland, Dept Sci Biol, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
Read
comments about this paper from lead author Daniel J. Funk.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“Barcoding uses the mitochondrial COI gene to attempt to identify unknown individuals, and/or identify cryptic species.”
|
|
This is a topic relevant to researchers interested in all
groups of organisms and working in many different fields ranging
from studies of speciation to fisheries stock management. Our
results suggest that speciation is an ongoing continuing process
for many, if not most, species of animals on the planet. It is
more and more popular to use data from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
to help determine where species boundaries should be drawn,
especially for researchers that emphasize the phylogenetic
species concept based on monophyly of mtDNA phylogenetic trees.
The survey demonstrates that simply relying on mtDNA gene trees
will result in species boundaries that disagree with many other
criteria. Our study suggests that it is important to use data
from a wide range of criteria—interbreeding, nuclear DNA,
behavior, morphology, ecology, etc.—not just mtDNA, when
delimiting species boundaries.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
Our findings are especially relevant to the newly popular
approach known as "DNA barcoding." Barcoding uses the
mitochondrial COI gene to attempt to identify unknown
individuals, and/or identify cryptic species. DNA barcodes will
work best if all species have species-typical DNA. We found that
23% of the 2000+ species in our survey do not show
"reciprocal monophyly" in mtDNA. Our results suggest
that researchers using DNA barcoding need to proceed with
caution. At the very least, many individuals per species should
be sampled, and information from morphology, geography, and
behavior also needs to be incorporated. However, if done
properly, barcoding can help determine with more precision the
frequency, causes, and consequences of species-level paraphyly.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
Most people, including most biologists, assume that each
species on the planet will have species-typical DNA—ravens
should have raven DNA; mallard ducks, mallard DNA; polar bears,
polar bear DNA and so on. However, because most species share
recent ancestry with other closely related species, often there
has not been enough time for mutations, natural selection, and
enough genetic drift to result in evolutionary distinctiveness
of their DNA. In addition, hybridization between distinct
species is a very common phenomenon in both animals and plants
which also results in intermixing of DNA between two or more
species. We have documented that nearly one quarter of all
animal species do not have distinctive sequences in their
maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA.
How
did you become involved in this research?
During my Ph.D. research I became interested in the case of
the intermixed mitochondrial DNA of Mallards and Black Ducks (Avise
et al, Evol 1990). I began compiling other
examples of this "species-level paraphyly" and
realized that there were many other examples. Dan Funk and I
began to compare notes on this topic several years ago, and we
realized that we had encountered very similar patterns of DNA
intermixing although we work on very different groups (insects
and birds respectively). During my postdoctoral research, I
uncovered a particularly dramatic example: the southwestern US
Chihuahuan Raven is deeply nested within the genetic diversity
of the widespread Holarctic Common Raven (Omland et al, Proc
Roy Soc 2000). I continue to be interested in how
species-level polyphyly and paraphyly can impact many research
fields from basic areas such as phylogenetics to applied areas
such as barcoding and wildlife forensics.
Dr. Kevin Omland
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Maryland (UMBC)
Baltimore, MD, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
April 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/april05-KevinOmland.html
|
|
|