Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

Fast Breaking Comments

By Kevin Omland

ESI Special Topics, April 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/april05-KevinOmland.html

Kevin Omland answers a few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of Environment/Ecology.


From •>>April 2005  

Field: Environment/Ecology
Article Title: Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA
Authors: Funk, DJ;Omland, KE
Journal: ANNU REV ECOL EVOL SYST
Volume: 34:
Page: 397-423
Year: 2003
* Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Sci Biol, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.
* Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.
* Univ Maryland, Dept Sci Biol, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
Read comments about this paper from lead author Daniel J. Funk.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?


Barcoding uses the mitochondrial COI gene to attempt to identify unknown individuals, and/or identify cryptic species.

This is a topic relevant to researchers interested in all groups of organisms and working in many different fields ranging from studies of speciation to fisheries stock management. Our results suggest that speciation is an ongoing continuing process for many, if not most, species of animals on the planet. It is more and more popular to use data from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to help determine where species boundaries should be drawn, especially for researchers that emphasize the phylogenetic species concept based on monophyly of mtDNA phylogenetic trees. The survey demonstrates that simply relying on mtDNA gene trees will result in species boundaries that disagree with many other criteria. Our study suggests that it is important to use data from a wide range of criteria—interbreeding, nuclear DNA, behavior, morphology, ecology, etc.—not just mtDNA, when delimiting species boundaries.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to others?

Our findings are especially relevant to the newly popular approach known as "DNA barcoding." Barcoding uses the mitochondrial COI gene to attempt to identify unknown individuals, and/or identify cryptic species. DNA barcodes will work best if all species have species-typical DNA. We found that 23% of the 2000+ species in our survey do not show "reciprocal monophyly" in mtDNA. Our results suggest that researchers using DNA barcoding need to proceed with caution. At the very least, many individuals per species should be sampled, and information from morphology, geography, and behavior also needs to be incorporated. However, if done properly, barcoding can help determine with more precision the frequency, causes, and consequences of species-level paraphyly.

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?

Most people, including most biologists, assume that each species on the planet will have species-typical DNA—ravens should have raven DNA; mallard ducks, mallard DNA; polar bears, polar bear DNA and so on. However, because most species share recent ancestry with other closely related species, often there has not been enough time for mutations, natural selection, and enough genetic drift to result in evolutionary distinctiveness of their DNA. In addition, hybridization between distinct species is a very common phenomenon in both animals and plants which also results in intermixing of DNA between two or more species. We have documented that nearly one quarter of all animal species do not have distinctive sequences in their maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research?

During my Ph.D. research I became interested in the case of the intermixed mitochondrial DNA of Mallards and Black Ducks (Avise et al, Evol 1990). I began compiling other examples of this "species-level paraphyly" and realized that there were many other examples. Dan Funk and I began to compare notes on this topic several years ago, and we realized that we had encountered very similar patterns of DNA intermixing although we work on very different groups (insects and birds respectively). During my postdoctoral research, I uncovered a particularly dramatic example: the southwestern US Chihuahuan Raven is deeply nested within the genetic diversity of the widespread Holarctic Common Raven (Omland et al, Proc Roy Soc 2000). I continue to be interested in how species-level polyphyly and paraphyly can impact many research fields from basic areas such as phylogenetics to applied areas such as barcoding and wildlife forensics.End

Dr. Kevin Omland
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Maryland (UMBC)
Baltimore, MD, USA

ESI Special Topics, April 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/april05-KevinOmland.html

•> Search Special Topics
Fast Breaking Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
Fast Breaking Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.