By Barry J. Huebert
ESI Special Topics,
February 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/february05-BarryJHuebert.html
|
Barry J. Huebert answers a
few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Geosciences.
From
•>>February 2005
Field:
Geosciences
Article Title: An overview of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic impacts - art. no. 8633
Authors: Huebert,
BJ;Bates, T;Russell, PB;Shi, GY;Kim,
YJ;Kawamura, K;Carmichael, G;Nakajima, T
Journal: J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS
Volume: 108
Page: 8633-8633
Year: NOV 14 2003
* Univ Hawaii, Dept Oceanog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA.
* Univ Hawaii, Dept Oceanog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA.
* NOAA, Pacific Marine Environm Lab, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
* NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA.
* Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
* Kwangju Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Adv Environm Monitoring Res
Ctr, Kwangju 500712, South Korea.
* Hokkaido Univ, Inst Low Temp Sci, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600819, Japan.
* Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA.
* Univ Tokyo, Ctr Climate Syst Res, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1538904, Japan.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“Although every large field program produces an overview paper, ours is different from most, in that it focuses on the methodologies that are most likely to produce useful insights and reduce uncertainties in climate models.”
|
|
The large interest in Asian aerosols and their radiative
impact is derived in part from the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change’s assertion that the largest uncertainties in
anthropogenic climate forcing models come from our poor
knowledge of aerosol distributions and properties. Our paper
describes a highly coordinated, international, interdisciplinary
experiment that was directed at the climatic impact of Asian
dust and pollution aerosols. Since these particles sometimes
travel for thousands of km, their impact can be global. One
Asian dust storm we studied, which had national evening-news
impacts on visibility in Colorado, was last seen by satellite
over the Canary Islands in the Eastern Atlantic. In some regions
their climatic impact dwarfs that of even CO2: one of our April
clear-sky direct forcing estimates for Asian aerosols in the NW
Pacific is -30 W/m2, an order of magnitude larger than all of
the greenhouse gases combined and opposite in sign.
Because of this high level of interest in aerosol radiative
forcing, we designed a coordinated field program involving
multiple aircraft, ships, ground stations, satellites, and
models, of the type recommended in a 1966 NRC report. We placed
a high priority on intercomparison of measurements from
different platforms to ensure that spatial and temporal
differences could be evaluated in the context of their
measurement uncertainties. We also coordinated all flights and
cruises with satellite overpasses, so that our in situ observations
could be generalized to larger regions. Most of our observations
were designed as closure studies, so that we could identify
inconsistencies between measurements and models. (An example is
the simultaneous measurement of aerosol light scattering and
absorption, alongside the solar fluxes the aerosols should
change. If a dust layer extinguished more sunlight than our in
situ measurements say it should, either the radiative
transfer model or the measurements were in error.) This enabled
us to identify those parts of the radiation/climate system where
uncertainties are still large and improved measurements or
models are needed.
The result is a very broad data set that can support tests of
a wide variety of aerosol and radiative transfer models. Authors
continue to use the data in new ways and usually cite our paper’s
description of the experimental strategies that guided its
collection.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
Although every large field program produces an overview
paper, ours is different from most, in that it focuses on the
methodologies that are most likely to produce useful insights
and reduce uncertainties in climate models. We describe a
variety of observing strategies and the things that can be
learned from each. Observations that are not well-posed may
offer little improvement in our understanding.
ACE-Asia has produced many new discoveries. One is that
mineral dust, which has often been treated as a chemically inert
substance, has a large impact on the fate of many air
pollutants. For instance, nitric acid and sulfur dioxide are
efficiently adsorbed onto large dust particles, thus depriving
the submicron aerosol mode of mass and acid substances. Even the
light absorption by soot is changed, since these tiny particles
are less likely to have their absorptivity increased by a
coating of sulfate when dust has taken up much of that sulfur.
In other words, the pollution and dust aerosols are not
independent modes, but both change each other significantly due
to their interaction.
One unique aspect of ACE-Asia was the use of a new
low-turbulence inlet (LTI) to sample dust particles from
aircraft. Traditional inlets lose most large particles as a
result of the high turbulence that accompanies the sudden change
from stationary to aircraft speed during sampling. Our profiles
of large particle properties are far more defendable as a result
of this technological advance in airborne aerosol sampling. We
found that dust particles aloft are very different from those at
the surface, so surface in situ measurements (the only
kind any nation can afford do every day) do not accurately
reflect aerosol properties in the column of air above the
surface. For instance, dust particles near the surface are much
more likely to have been modified by pollution than those in the
mid-troposphere, making them more soluble and more likely to
grow by taking up water vapor.
Chemical transport models were being improved even before we
finished our intensive field operations. Three chemical
transport models were used in a forecast mode to guide our
flights. When the NSF/NCAR C-130 encountered a huge dust plume
over the Yellow Sea that had not been forecast by these models,
the modelers quickly identified a missing source: a dried-up
lake bed in NE China which (although small compared to the
deserts) could cause large impacts on the heavily-populated
regions of Eastern Asia. Interestingly, this lake was apparently
lost due to pumping of ground water for irrigation, so this dust
would meet the IPCC’s definition of an anthropogenic aerosol
forcing.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
The temperature, rainfall, and storminess of the Earth are
controlled in large part by how much of the sun’s light is
captured by the Earth. For example the Earth would very rapidly
become an oven if clouds and light-colored surfaces did not
reflect about 30% of incoming sunlight back to space. Tiny
particles (dust and pollution) in the atmosphere also can
reflect sunlight back to space or in some cases (diesel soot)
absorb sunlight and contribute to warming the Earth. Although we
know generally how these particles affect the climate, we can’t
predict the exact amount of sunlight change as accurately as we
need to, to make expensive policy decisions about pollution
controls and greenhouse gas emissions.
In the Aerosol Characterization Experiments, or ACE-Asia
program, hundreds of scientists from 13 countries carefully
measured dust and pollution particles in Asia at the same time
as they measured the changes in sunlight due to these particles.
This has made it possible to improve our understanding of the
particles’ impact on the climate, so that more accurate
predictive models can be created. We found, for instance, that
natural dust and man-made pollution mix together and make
particles that are different from those produced by either
source.
We also found that Asian particles can be transported to
North America and beyond, making their impact a global one.
Since every nation emits air pollutants, the need to accurately
predict their impact is common to all countries. That is why a
study in Asia is important to people around the entire globe.
Collaborative experiments like ACE-Asia by many countries offer
the best chance of understanding the impact of aerosol particles
on the Earth on which we live together.
How
did you become involved in this research?
To be perfectly honest, I love working on airplanes. Ever
since my first research flight on the National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Electra almost 30 years ago, I’ve
been thinking about ways to more accurately sample trace
substances from aircraft. During the Dynamics
and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus (DYCOMS) Experiment
in 1985, our aerosol and cloud composition measurements could
only be explained by huge losses in the sampling systems which
we had never fully tested. This lead to a series of experiments
that culminated in the development of the Low Turbulence Inlet,
or LTI, we used in ACE-Asia, so we could finally sample large
particles with a definable measured/ambient relationship. My
background in physical chemistry also encourages me to think a
lot about what constitutes a valid measurement and what
artifacts could deceive us. It is very easy to make bad aerosol
measurements, because of inertial issues which arise during
sampling.
ACE-Asia was the fourth in a series of aerosol
characterization experiments organized by the International
Global Atmospheric Chemistry Program, IGAC, a core program of
the International Geopshere-Biosphere Program, IGBP. All the ACE
experiments were designed to involve scientists from many
countries, working on understanding the source of atmospheric
aerosols, their properties, how they change with space and time,
and their impact on the climate system. I was fortunate to be
involved with the creation of IGAC and to participate in the
organization of IGAC experiments like ACE-Asia. Along the way I
worked a lot on developing observing strategies—such as
Lagrangian experiments—that would make measurements more
useful for constraining the processes programmed into models.
Finally, this kind of research is fun. I’ve gotten to
travel all around the world, working with great friends who
share this passion. I love flying in the cockpit and still get
excited when I see runway lights lined up ahead of me. I look
forward to going to work each day and learning new things about
how the atmosphere works. And I get paid for this!
Recommended
reading:
- NRC, Panel
on Aerosol Radiative Forcing and Climate Change, Aerosol
Radiative Forcing and Climate Change, 161 pp., National
Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
- Huebert, B.J.,
S.G. Howell, D. Covert, T. Bertram, A. Clarke, J.R.
Anderson, B.G. Lafleur, W.R. Seebaugh, J.C. Wilson, D.
Gesler, B. Blomquist, and J. Fox, PELTI: Measuring the
passing efficiency of an airborne low turbulence aerosol
inlet, Aerosol Science and Technology, 38 (8),
803-826, 2004.
- Lenschow,
D.H., I.R. Paluch, A.R. Bandy, R. Pearson Jr., S.R. Kawa,
C.J. Weaver, B.J. Huebert, J.G. Kay, D.C. Thornton, and
A.R.D. III, Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus (DYCOMS)
Experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 69 (9),
1,058-1,067, 1988.

Barry J. Huebert
Professor
Department of Oceanography
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Honolulu, HI, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
February 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/february05-BarryJHuebert.html
|
|
|