Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
This paper is the first to take an in-depth look
at the adequacy of current dietary, supplementation, and food
fortification practices of countries worldwide to provide needed
intakes of vitamin D. Until just recently, it was thought that
most individuals synthesized all their vitamin D needs with
routine exposure of their face and arms to sunlight and therefore
very little attention was given to determining the adequacy of
dietary vitamin D intake.
|
“Health scientists are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of vitamin D to prevent a variety of chronic diseases, but there is a current dilemma facing the public as to what the appropriate source of vitamin D should be.”
|
|
Three major findings in the last decade have
forced us to take a closer look at the adequacy of vitamin D
intake. First, an epidemic of rickets or severe vitamin D
deficiency in breast-fed dark-skinned infants prompted us to look
at the vitamin D status of the entire population, which led to the
discovery of a surprisingly high prevalence of poor vitamin D
status in North America, especially in dark-skinned individuals
and the elderly.
Second, a growing number of cross-sectional
observational studies report significant association between low
circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the main indicator of vitamin D
status, and increased risk of osteoporosis, diabetes, cancer, and
autoimmune disorders, causing us to conclude that there is
potential for serious health risks associated with poor intake or
impaired photosynthesis of vitamin D.
The third important finding is that the previous
circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D that were thought to be
adequate or sufficient in otherwise healthy individuals are now
widely recognized to be deficient/insufficient and are associated
with increased risk of serious chronic diseases. It is now very
clear, that North Americans in general are becoming more reliant
on dietary sources to maintain adequate circulating levels of
25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Many individuals avoid sun exposure for various
reasons, including fear of increased risk of skin cancer, or for
cultural or religious reasons they wear clothing that blocks
vitamin D synthesis. Those North Americans living at latitudes
above 37° N cannot synthesize vitamin D in the winter months when
sunlight does not have sufficient UVB rays that are required for
vitamin D synthesis. And homebound individuals, or the elderly and
darkly-pigmented individuals, cannot synthesize sufficient vitamin
D in the summer. Without sufficient dietary vitamin D in these
situations, individuals are placed at greater health risk due to
vitamin D insufficiency.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?
Our review reveals the general global inadequacy
of the food supply to provide adequate vitamin D intake in
countries without mandatory fortification of important staple
foods such as milk or margarine. Those clinicians advocating total
avoidance of sunlight to reduce the risk of skin cancer need to
know that increased reliance on the food supply for sources of
vitamin D will necessitate public health strategies that provide
greater availability of fortified food staples, dietary supplement
use, and/or changes in dietary patterns to increase the intake of
vitamin D-rich foods, such as fish.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
Health scientists are becoming increasingly aware
of the importance of vitamin D to prevent a variety of chronic
diseases, but there is a current dilemma facing the public as to
what the appropriate source of vitamin D should be.
Casual skin exposure to sunlight which stimulates
vitamin D synthesis in the skin was previously thought to be the
major source of vitamin D. However, safety concerns about sun
exposure have resulted in guidelines that clearly limit sun
exposure to prevent skin cancer.
Dietary sources of vitamin D are suggested as
suitable alternatives to the lost source of vitamin D when sun
exposure is limited, but this recommendation was made without
establishing the ability of the food supply to meet these needs.
We examined the current estimates of vitamin D
intake world-wide and show evidence that the current food supply,
pattern of use of dietary supplements, and dietary patterns of
most countries, do not provide enough vitamin D to meet the
dietary intake guidelines or individual needs.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were any problems
encountered along the way?
Drs. Calvo and Whiting initially focused on
reporting the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in their
respective North American countries, the US and Canada. Each
country faces a unique problem concerning vitamin D status of the
population, and yet they share common dietary guidelines.
Vitamin D insufficiency in Canada is largely
associated with its northerly location and insufficient source of
sunlight to synthesize vitamin D over a significant number of
months in a year, even in its predominantly light-skinned
population.
In the US where the population is more
heterogeneous, there is a greater prevalence of vitamin D
insufficiency among the darker-skinned individuals living at all
latitudes, but notably in the northern latitudes year round.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Our research provides valuable information that
can help government agencies formulate public health strategies
that will allow them to effectively improve the nutritional
quality of their unique food supply. It contributes to our overall
goal of achieving better health through optimal nutrition.