Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
The paper is a review of the work from my laboratory. It
was written in late 2005 and published in 2006. There is
currently an enormous interest in the hypothesis that there
is an enhanced release of inflammatory cytokines/adipokines
by adipose tissue from obese humans which contributes to the
worst side effects of
obesity, such as
diabetes and
cardiovascular disease. Our unique contribution outlines how
this is probably due to the nonfat cells in human adipose
tissue rather than the fat cells.
jLEFT TABLE
|

“Our
research supports the growing consensus that
massive obesity is a major health problem.” |
|
|
As of November 2007, two other papers by our group, which
have been cited 154 and 66 times, respectively [ISI Web
of KnowledgeSM] since their
publication, are: Fain JN, et al, "Comparison of the
release of adipokines by adipose tissue, adipose tissue
matrix, and adipocytes from visceral and subcutaneous
abdominal adipose tissues of obese humans," Endocrinology
145 (5): 2273-2282, MAY 2004 and Fain JN, et al, "Resistin
release by human adipose tissue explants in primary
culture," Biochemical and Biophysical Research
Communications 300 (3): 674-678, JAN 17, 2003.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
It is essentially a synthesis of knowledge about the key
role of nonfat cells in the release of 23 different
cytokines/adipokines by human adipose tissue. The data on 12
cytokines/adipokines were in the two papers cited above and
the data on nine others have since been published. After the
review was written, we have published data on another three
cytokines, bringing the total to 27.
Would
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
The report is highly cited because it provides
information, based on studies with human fat (adipose
tissue), indicating that it is the greater release of
cytokines/adipokines by adipose tissue as the amount of
tissue expands in obesity, which is probably responsible for
the epidemic of obesity and cardiovascular disease. Our
unique contribution is to emphasize that most of these
cytokines/adipokines come from cells other than fat cells.
These cells are involved in support, as well as in
nutrient and oxygen delivery to the fat cells. The non-fat
cells increase in fat when there is an increase in the
amount of fat just as roads are widened when the number of
cars increases in a country. We know that the harmful
effects of obesity can be reversed by weight loss, which is
essentially a reduction in fat mass, but we don’t yet know
how to accomplish this with a pill.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any
problems along the way?
I have worked on the metabolism of fat tissue for over 40
years but most of my studies were with rodents. It became
clear that what were needed were studies using human fat
tissue. I found it could be obtained from surgeons during
bariatric surgery on morbidly obese humans.
One major problem was funding, which could not be
obtained from the NIH, because I wasn’t doing a
mechanism-based research, the kind that is difficult to do
with human fat. I persevered, using sources of
institutional, hospital, and commercial funding. Over the
past 10 years the budget for this research has averaged less
than $60,000 per year; this total only covered the cost of
one research assistant and the necessary supplies.
Another roadblock occurred when the surgeon I was
collaborating with suddenly quit doing surgery and it was
almost a year before a new surgeon could be recruited.
Originally I had been investigating leptin, which is the
only adipokine released exclusively by fat cells, using
subcutaneous adipose tissue from morbidly obese humans. To
occupy my time, I turned to looking at other putative
adipokines released by human fat samples that I had been
working with.
During this interim period another surgeon, who
occasionally did bariatric surgery, but primarily did
so-called "tummy-tucks" on formerly obese patients a year
after bariatric surgery, when the amount of fat in each
human was reduced from an average of 56 kilograms to 32
kilograms. Since surgery was done so seldom, I decided to
look at fat from these patients and compare subcutaneous
adipose tissue with visceral omental adipose tissue. I soon
left leptin and concentrated on comparing the release of
every adipokine that I could measure using enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays (ELISA) by both omental and
subcutaneous adipose tissue from morbidly obese patients and
similar patients one year after surgery.
It is established that the enhanced incidence of diabetes
in morbidly obese individuals—those with a BMI averaging
45—is reversed in over 90% of them after bariatric surgery,
when the BMI drops to 32, even though this BMI indicates
that they are still obese. Furthermore, the visceral omental
fat which is so prominent in men with a so-called "beer
belly" obesity, is thought to contribute more to the adverse
effects of obesity than fat in the peripheral tissues, where
all the fat is subcutaneous. We now work almost exclusively
with human omental fat, which became a necessity when new
bariatric surgeons arrived and did only minimally invasive
surgery.
Where
do you see your research leading in the future?
We are continuing our research on cytokine/adipokine
release by omental fat by examining the mRNAs for many
proteins in freshly isolated samples of human fat and in the
fat cells derived from this tissue. These studies indicate
that the enhanced release of adipokines during in vitro
incubation of adipose tissue from obese humans is reflected
in the mRNA distribution between the non-fat cells and fat
cells. We are also examining the correlation between waist
circumference—the easiest to obtain and reliable clinical
index of visceral obesity—and the mRNA content of cytokines
and regulatory factors in visceral omental adipose tissue.
In another study we are also investigating the effect of
diabetes, by correlating blood glucose values with mRNA
values in omental adipose tissue.
A further expansion of my research is in collaboration
with cardiovascular surgeons and a local endocrinologist.
During so-called "coronary artery bypass graft surgery" (CABG),
when the right coronary artery is replaced with a blood
vessel from another area, it is possible to obtain small
samples of adipose tissue from five different depots. We
will examine the correlation between waist circumference and
the extent of diabetes with the level of the mRNAs for over
50 proteins.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Our research supports the growing consensus that massive
obesity is a major health problem. The good news is that the
deleterious effects of enhanced cytokine/adipokine research
by adipose tissue can be reversed by weight reduction. The
bad news is that, apart from
bariatric surgery,
which is major surgery with a risk of death or other serious
side effects, there is no effective way to accomplish this
using a pill. Exercise and diet work in some obese
individuals, but even when successful over the short-term,
most individuals will regain the weight within the following
year.
Hopefully, research such as we are doing will result in
new knowledge that could result in a pill which would be as
effective in the treatment of obesity as anti-hypertensive
pills are for the treatment of hypertension.
John. N. Fain, Ph.D.
Van Vleet Chair of Excellence in Biochemistry
and Professor
Department of Molecular Sciences
College of Medicine
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, TN, USA