Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Simply mention the term "dendritic cell subtypes" or "dendritic
cell development" to some immunologists, or even dendritic
cell (DC) biologists, and their eyes will glaze over. While
it’s well accepted that this unique family of white blood
cells kick-start the immune response, it can be quite
difficult to sort the trash from the treasure in this
controversial area.
I believe the high citation rate of this paper reflect my
and Ken Shortman’s attempt to collate three decades of
research in this area and present the DC lifecycle in a more
digestible and logical format. We also highlight several new
concepts that entice a rethink on the subject for those more
involved in the area.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
 |
 |
|
“This paper establishes a preliminary
framework to consider the development of DC
subtypes in more detail but with better
context..” |
|
This paper establishes a preliminary framework to
consider the development of DC subtypes in more detail but
with better context. We used evidence of i) organ location,
ii) derivation from progenitors, iii) factor-dependency iv)
presence in the steady-state versus inflammation, and v)
representation in culture models, to make some broad
definitions of the DC types and their development.
Undoubtedly, there will be additional brushstrokes to this
sketch in the future.
Would
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
I often describe DCs as the "spies" or James Bond of the
immune system. When they’re not in action, they’re
"pacifying" some of the potentially dangerous female
soldiers (T-cell tolerance to prevent autoimmune disease in
the steady-state). But when activated, they take
photographic snapshots (antigen presentation) of the
invading enemy (infectious organism), jump into their Aston
Martin (the lymphatics and bloodstream) back to the
headquarters of the immune system (lymph nodes and spleen)
and present their enemy dossier to the soldiers (T cells and
B cells).
In this paper, we describe the different types of spies
of the immune system, where they lie in wait for the enemy,
and where they got their training. Some come from the "Roger
Moore" school of training (steady-state resident pDCs, CD8+
and CD8– DCs), some from the "Sean Connery" school
(migratory DCs) and others from the "Daniel Craig" school
(inflammatory DCs). There may even be a "Pierce Brosnan"
school not yet discovered—although that may be one we’d
rather forget!
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any
problems along the way?
Through working in David Hume’s lab at the Institute for
Molecular Bioscience at the University of Queensland, I
became interested in antigen-presenting cells and the
differences between macrophages and DCs. David is oft quoted
saying "DCs are just macrophages, but without teeth." Along
those lines, each DC subtype was regarded by many as simply
a color in the myeloid rainbow but not a distinct lineage in
their own right.
Previous work from Ken Shortman’s lab suggested
otherwise, with evidence that the subtypes were "wired"
differently and were distinct cell types. After I joined
Ken’s lab at The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), our
work dissected that different subtypes have distinct
precursors, and not all are myeloid in origin.
As for problems, there were many. If you consider DCs are
already one of the most rare cell types, imagine how
infrequent their progenitors must be. In fact, I found out
after the first one and a half years of my Ph.D. that my
strategy to deplete irrelevant cells was removing DC
precursors non-specifically. When I realized this, I threw
my lab book in the bin and went to the pub with a close
friend! On the following day at 1pm, red-eyed and unshaven,
I started all over again with a different strategy.
Where
do you see your research leading in the future?
The DC subtypes and their development are still an
enigma. It is clear that they can be derived from both
myeloid and lymphoid routes, but they are the only cell type
able to do this—why? Do DCs arrive in a continuous flux from
the bone marrow, or develop within the organs themselves
from long-term precursors?
What are the intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in
their development? Where do they fit into the haematopoietic
map? Which subtype is important for which infection? Why do
we need so many subtypes? What are the human equivalents of
the mouse CD8+ and CD8– subtypes? More importantly, once the
rules are established, which DC subtype will lead to a
better application of this cell type in medicine?
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Considering the power of DCs in initiating an immune
response, many are attempting to train a patient’s DCs to
fight cancer and infection. While this strategy has had
mixed success, it certainly holds promise. In fact, Ralph
Steinman, head of the Laboratory for Cellular Physiology and
Immunology at Rockefeller University, who discovered DCs,
was awarded this year’s Albert Lasker Award for Medical
Research. This award is often considered the prelude to the
Nobel Prize…so watch this space!
Dr. Shalin H. Naik
Marie Curie Fellow
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Professor Ken Shortman
Head of the Immunology Division
The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI)
Melbourne, Australia