Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
At the time this paper was published, little attention
had been given to
quantum dot
technology from a toxicological perspective. Most
nanotoxicology papers and conferences had, and continue to
focus, on carbon-based materials, with lesser emphasis on
metalloid based nano-materials.
|

“It is hoped that this paper draws attention to this fact,
and expresses to the reader the need for wise and
responsible development and application of the novel and
emerging field of
nanotechnology.”
|
|
I think people probably found my paper, which is a review
of quantum dot technology from a nanotoxicological
perspective, informative and interesting to read. Perhaps
for many readers it was their first real exposure to a
discussion of quantum dot technology, the societal benefits
of this technology, and the potential adverse environmental
and human health effects as well. It is primarily for these
reasons that I think the paper was frequently cited.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
As a review article it really addresses a novel
technology, and synthesizes what is currently known, and
unknown, regarding these materials.
Would
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
The significance of this paper is that it draws attention
to the fine balance between economic growth/development—in
this case, a technological advancement—and the potential
adverse societal impacts of such advances when they are not
properly implemented.
History has shown us, in quite clear terms, that economic
growth and development, along with technological advances,
have often had a marked deleterious impact on human health
and the environment (e.g. industry, PAHs,
PCBs, dioxins,
mercury).
It was not so much the technologies themselves, or the
economic engines that had direct deleterious effects on
humans and ecosystems, but rather our ignorance of how to
wisely use and employ these technologies.
It is hoped that this paper draws attention to this fact,
and expresses to the reader the need for wise and
responsible development and application of the novel and
emerging field of
nanotechnology.
All environmental problems are fundamentally economic,
and nanotechnology, due to its potentially significant
positive impacts on economic growth and development, poses
equally significant risks to the environment and human
health.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any
particular problems encountered along the way?
I became interested in nanotechnology and, specifically,
in quantum dot technologies, because it is a wonderful new
tool in terms of biomedical research, specifically in
imaging technologies.
I came to this technology from the user end of the
spectrum, and, being a toxicologist, also recognized the
potential toxicity of these materials if not handled and
disposed of properly. Of course this led to the recognition
of, in the event of bulk production and deployment, the
potential societal risks posed by this technology.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
The social implications of my research are really very
specific—that of human health. My work focuses on the
relationship between the environment and human health. This
relationship is intimate and direct. A healthy environment
means no environmental exposures to carcinogens, mutagens,
etc. So the social implications of my work are really those
of public health.
In terms of finding a solution to the problem, it is not
really about the environment, but rather about the twin
economic drivers of business and industry, which are the
primary sources of environmental toxicants-exposures.
I prefer to address the environmental-human health
relationship through toxicology, and an examination of
business-environment relationships. Here the word business
implies both economic growth and development. And we see
this struggle right now in terms of mediating carbon usage
and outputs in carbon-based energy societies. Some of this
gets into sustainable development, where it can be seen in
emerging trends in the "greening" of business.
I would emphasize there are distinct social
(environmental and human health) and political (regulatory)
implications that result from my area of research. This is
really exciting stuff, and business-environment
relationships will, in my opinion, be a key interface which
is due to receive a great deal of attention, innovation, and
growth.

Ron Hardman, Ph.D.
Duke University
Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences
Division of Environmental Science and Policy
Durham, NC, USA