By Edmund Copeland, M. Sami, & Shinji Tsujikawa
ESI Special Topics,
October 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2007/october07-Copeland_etal.html
|
Edmund Copeland, M. Sami, & Shinji Tsujikawa
answer a
few questions about this
month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Space Science. The
authors have also
sent along images of their work.
From
•>>October 2007
Field: Space Science
Article Title: Dynamics of
dark energy
Authors:
Copeland, EJ;Sami, M;Tsujikawa, S
Journal: INT J MOD PHYS D
Volume: 15
Issue: 11
Page: 1753-1935
Year: NOV 2006
* Univ Nottingham, Sch Phys &; Astron, Univ Pk, Nottingham
NG7 2RD, England.
* Univ Nottingham, Sch Phys &; Astron, Nottingham NG7 2RD,
England.
* Jamia Millia Islamia, Ctr Theoret Phys, New Delhi 110025,
India.
* Gunma Natl Coll Technol, Dept Phys, Gunma 3718530, Japan.
|
 |
| |
November
1,
2007:
This paper has also been named the New Hot Paper in
Space Science for
November 2007. |
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
We have presented the most complete review to date of the
many attempts to explain the origin of
dark energy,
the remarkable energy that many believe to be responsible
for the observed acceleration of the Universe in the
framework of Einstein’s theory of gravity, general
relativity.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
 |
 |
 |
|
“We have presented the most complete
review to date of the many attempts to
explain the origin of
dark energy, the remarkable energy that
many believe to be responsible for the
observed acceleration of the Universe in the
framework of Einstein Theory of Gravity.” |
|
Since this is a review article, it is primarily a
synthesis of knowledge. It also describes a methodology used
by many in the field, because it concentrates on approaches
to model dynamical dark energy. We have also implemented
some new results which were not published elsewhere.
This is a huge subject, with over 1,300 papers appearing
on the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) database
since 1998 with the words "dark energy" in the title. In
this situation, it is generally difficult for people new to
the field to judge where the main progress has been made. We
have tried to make this review comprehensive, so that people
interested in dark energy, whether from an astrophysical or
particle physics standpoint can easily follow it. Our paper
is the most detailed and latest theoretical review on the
subject.
Would
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
Since many dark energy models have been proposed so far,
it is very important to classify them and also to understand
the significance of these models, both theoretically and
observationally. In our article, we have provided the most
complete review of the approaches which have been adopted,
in order to try and explain the nature of the current
accelerating Universe. We have also discussed a number of
interesting future directions that could lead to an
understanding of the origin of dark energy.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any
problems along the way?
The supernova observations first reported in 1998,
coupled with detailed observations of anisotropies in the
cosmic microwave background and the distribution of large
scale structure have led us to believe that the universe is
accelerating and is dominated by a novel form of energy
called "dark energy." The simplest candidate for dark energy
is the "cosmological constant," but, whereas it fits the
data well, there is a real problem explaining its size from
a particle physics point of view.
It has led a number of physicists (including ourselves)
to investigate alternative models of dark energy, both
within the context of particle physics or simply from a
phenomenological point of view. These models allow the dark
energy to be dynamical evolving to today's observed value.
In spite of the tremendous efforts that have been made, we
have not yet been able to definitively identify the origin
of dark energy. In our opinion, understanding this poses the
biggest challenge facing physics in the 21st century.
Where
do you see your research leading in the future?
In the next five years or so, we will have more precise
observational data to constrain the dark energy even more,
and possibly to determine whether it is dynamical or a
simply cosmological constant. On the theoretical side, there
will be a continued effort to explain the origin of dark
energy from fundamental theory such as string theory.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
None, other than the fact that it is a subject of real
interest to the general public.
Edmund J. Copeland
Professor
Cripps Centre for Astronomy and Particle Theory
University of Nottingham
United Kingdom
Dr. M. Sami
Professor
Centre for Theoretical Physics
Jamia Millia Islamia
New Delhi, India
Shinji Tsujikawa
Lecturer
Department of Physics
Gunma National College of Technology
Gunma, Japan
|
|
A Closer Look...
|
 |
Below
is an image sent in by Edmund Copeland, M. Sami, & Shinji Tsujikawa which corresponds with the featured
paper, or current research. |
|
|
Figure 1:
 |
| |
|
ESI Special Topics,
October 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2007/october07-Copeland_etal.html
|
|
|