By Robert Heaton Ph.D.
ESI Special Topics, June 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/comments/june02-RobertHeaton.html
|
Robert Heaton Ph.D. answers
a few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in
field of Psychiatry/Psychology.
From
•>>June 2002
Field: Psychiatry/Psychology
Article Title:
"Stability and course of neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia"
Authors: Heaton,
RK;Gladsjo, JA;Palmer, BW;Kuck,
J;Marcotte, TD;Jeste, DV
Journal: ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT
Volume: 58
Page: 24-32
Year: JAN 2001
* Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, 140 Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103 USA.
* Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA.
* Vet Affairs San Diego Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
First, because of the importance of the questions addressed;
is neuropsychological impairment in schizophrenia a reliable,
trait-related characteristic of the illness, or does it
fluctuate with clinical symptoms; is schizophrenia
associated with progressive cognitive decline and, if so, how
often does this occur and what are the baseline characteristics
of the patients who are affected in this way? A second reason I
think it is cited frequently is that the study methods improve
on those of previous studies of this topic: This was a study of
large groups of patients with schizophrenia (n=142) and normal
comparison subjects (n=206) who were followed longitudinally for
up to 10 years (mean=3) with standardized clinical and
comprehensive neuropsychological testing. In addition to
comparing changes in group means, norms for neuropsychological
change were developed with the control subjects and applied to
individual subjects with schizophrenia, in an effort to identify
and characterize any subgroup of patients who experience
cognitive decline.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to
others?
I think using neuropsychological norms for change in this
type of research has important advantages, especially when one
is trying to identify a phenomenon—cognitive change, in this
case, deterioration—that does not occur in all or even in most
people with the disease in question.
Can
you give us some background on this research?
Early observers considered schizophrenia a dementing illness,
i.e. dementia praecox, yet most modern, cross-sectional studies
of patients with schizophrenia have not found that cognitive
"impairment", corrected for normal aging, is greater
in patients who are older or more chronic; i.e. most cross
sectional data do not suggest a progressive course of cognitive
decline in schizophrenia.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
In our sample of ambulatory patients with schizophrenia,
cognitive functioning over time was highly reliable and stable.
Their cognitive status was not altered by fluctuations of
psychotic symptoms, and we were unable to identify even a small
subgroup of patients whose cognition deteriorated over the
follow-up period. A limitation of this study is that we did not
include chronically institutionalized patients, so our results
cannot be generalized to this relatively small but important
subgroup.
Robert K. Heaton, Ph.D.,
Professor of Psychiatry,
University of California at San Diego.
Related:
View the special topic: Schizophrenia
and read interviews/essays
from some of the top scientists in the field.
|
ESI Special Topics, June 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/comments/june02-RobertHeaton.html
|
|
|