Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
Thomson
Essential Science Indicators - Special Topics  RSS feeds for the editorial Web sites of Essential Science Indicators.
All Topics Menu
Help || About || Contact

  
|  Previous Page  |
  |  Special Topics Menu  |  |  Next Page  |
  

ESI Special Topic of:
"Uterine Fibroids," Published March 2005

•> Search Special Topics
Uterine Fibroids Menu

Uterine Fibroids

An INTERVIEW with Dr. Keith Skubitz

ESI Special Topics, September 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fibroids/interviews/KeithSkubitz.html

In the interview below, Special Topics correspondent Gary Taubes talks with Dr. Keith Skubitz about his research involving uterine fibroids. Dr. Skubitz is the lead author of two of the 20 most-cited papers on uterine fibroids over the past two years: "Differential gene expression in uterine leiomyoma" (Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 141: 297-308, 2003), and "Differential gene expression in leiomyosarcoma" (Cancer 98: 1029-38, 2003). Dr. Skubitz is a Professor of Medicine in the Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation at the University of Minnesota Medical School.

ST:  As an oncologist interested mostly, it seems, in malignancies, how did you get into the study of uterine fibroids?

Well, we were interested in looking at gene expression in sarcomas. Sarcomas arise in different types of connective tissue, including muscle, and there are many subtypes of sarcomas. As a starting point for this we wanted to look at smooth muscle sarcomas, known as leiomyosarcomas. Sometimes leiomyosarcomas can arise from leiomyomas, which are the kind of benign tumor in uterine fibroids, but usually that’s not the case. So we thought it might be interesting to do a systematic analysis. We would start by looking at what genes are expressed in leiomyomas, and compare them to the genes expressed in normal myometrium. Then we could compare them with leiomyosarcomas in other muscles. That’s why we did the leiomyomas. As it turned out, and as we published in a later paper, we got some leads for leiomyosarcomas that we wouldn’t have picked up if we hadn’t done leiomyomas first.

ST:  So what is the primary difference between leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas?


“…we examined a huge number of genes, looking for the difference between normal tissue and benign tissue, so that we could identify which of these genes are unique to the benign tumor. This could potentially provide a target for therapy and tell us something about how these things come about and grow.”

The main difference is that leiomyomas are benign and leiomyosarcomas are malignant. Although most leiomyosarcomas don’t arise in uterine tissue, a fair percentage do. We have smooth muscle almost everywhere in the body, but uterine muscle is basically all smooth muscle.

ST:  Your co-author is also a Skubitz. Is that your wife?

Yes, we’re a team. She’s on the faculty in a different department, and we do a lot of research together.

ST:  What were the primary observations in your highly cited 2003 Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine article?

We not only looked at differences in gene expression between leiomyomas and normal uterine muscle from which it arises, but we also looked at gene expression in a wide variety of other normal tissues. That made it a much more extensive study. We compared the leiomyoma gene expression with 18 types of normal tissue—for example, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, etc.—and each set contained a sizable number of samples. We were able to identify genes uniquely expressed in leiomyomas among these normal tissues.

ST:  Do you think that’s why it’s been cited so frequently in such a short time?

It’s probably because it was, first of all, a big study. There were a lot of samples, more than 250. Second, at the time, it was probably the most extensive number of genes ever looked at in leiomyomas. A third point would be the fact that we were able to look at these genes in many different tumors and normal tissues.

ST:  What did you learn about leiomyosarcomas from this research, and where did you publish that paper?

That research was published in Cancer in 2003. We used some of the genes identified in the paper we’ve been talking about, and found that they are also expressed in leiomyosarcomas. As I said, we wouldn’t have found them otherwise. They’re only expressed in a subset of leiomyosarcomas. Doublecortin, for instance, is a gene expressed in leiomyosarcomas. We also found other genes over-expressed in leiomyosarcomas. One reason to do these assays is so we can then see if a gene is expressed more in cancer than in normal tissue. In the case of doublecortin, we found that it seems to be expressed in some uterine leiomyosarcomas, but not all of them.

ST:  Does that tell you anything about the cause or progression of leiomyosarcomas?

That’s a difficult question to answer. But, however these leiomyosarcomas work, it’s being partly described by these data. Clearly what we found there is very important in how they work, but it doesn’t really tell us how to put it all together to fully understand it.

ST:  Was there an element of serendipity in your research?

I think it’s kind of lucky that we did the leiomyoma paper first in terms of the leiomyosarcoma paper. If we hadn’t, we never would have found the doublecortin expression in leiomyosarcoma, for example.

ST:  Why did you publish the leiomyosarcoma paper in Cancer and the uterine fibroid paper in the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine?

We prefer not to publish everything in the same place. I think these days the choice of what journal you go to isn’t as important as it used to be. Now almost everybody finds papers of interest by searching on PubMed.

ST:  Did you expect the leiomyoma paper to be so quickly influential?

I’m surprised. I don’t really know how often my papers are cited. I don’t pay attention to that. Certainly, leiomyomas are a common problem, and most women get some, so maybe that contributes to the citation rate.

ST:  What’s the hardest part of doing this work?

When you’re working with these DNA microarrays, each sample comes up with 40,000 to 60,000 numbers—that’s per sample. So to do the analysis, you have to rely on certain statistical approaches, and you can come up with false positives and negatives when you do that. How you analyze the data is very important, and it’s not always perfectly straightforward what the best way to do it is. There’s always more than one way, so figuring out which one is the best without being misled is a challenge.

ST:  What’s the next step in your research?

We’re continuing to look at gene expression in different types of sarcoma along with some other malignancies. We’re not really following up on the leiomyomas per se. We’re looking more at the malignant aspects of tumors. We’re looking for potential targets in these leiomyosarcomas and other tumors that wouldn’t be present in normal tissue. If we find these, then we can exploit them. We’re also trying to identify subgroups that would have practical significance within some of the common tumor types.

ST:  What message would you want to pass on to the general public about your research?

The message that comes out of this is that we used a large number of samples of leiomyomas and normal tissue; we examined a huge number of genes, looking for differences between normal tissue and leiomyomas, so that we could identify which of these genes are unique to the benign tumor. We found several genes quite selectively expressed in leiomyomas. This could potentially provide a target for therapy and tell us something about how these tumors come about and grow.

ST:  How has this research changed over the past decade?

That’s easy. We didn’t even have a glimmer that we could do this type of thing 10 years ago. Microarray technology was first described about 10 years ago, and commercial development came later. As soon as we learned about it and realized we could do it, that’s what we wanted to do. Ten years ago, it would have been mind-boggling to think that such a thing was possible. It’s still kind of amazing.End

Keith M. Skubitz, M.D.
University of Minnesota Medical School
Minneapolis, MN, USA

ESI Special Topics, September 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fibroids/interviews/KeithSkubitz.html

ESI Special Topic of:
"Uterine Fibroids," Published March 2005

•> Search Special Topics
Uterine Fibroids Menu || All Topics Menu ||
Interview Index
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.