|
From
•>>November 2004
Eugene V. Koonin answers
a few questions about this month's fast moving front in the
field of Computer Science.
Field: Computer Science
Article: Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification
Authors: Koonin,
EV;Makarova, KS;Aravind, L
Journal: ANNU REV MICROBIOL, 55: 709-742, 2001
Addresses: Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA.
Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA.
Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, F Edward Hebert Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA.
|
|

Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
It is an analytical review of a crucially important
evolutionary phenomenon—horizontal gene transfer—the true
scope of which has become apparent only after multiple
prokaryotic genomes have been sequenced. Many researchers are
understandably interested in horizontal gene transfer, and this
paper seems to provide a coherent conceptual framework for
theoretical and experimental analysis of this phenomenon.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to
others?
This paper is a review and as such describes neither a
specific new discovery nor a method. However, in my assessment,
it has two innovative aspects: 1) for the first time,
conservative quantitative estimates are given of the number of
genes that likely have been acquired via horizontal transfer in
a variety of prokaryotic genomes; 2) an evolutionary
classification of horizontal gene transfer events is presented.
How
did you become involved in this research?
The extensive, genome-wide horizontal gene transfer became
apparent when several bacterial and archaeal genomes had been
sequenced in 1997-1998. The first publications arguing for
extensive horizontal gene transfer, including those from our
group, appeared at that time. By the end of the 20th
century, it was time to try and place these findings within a
single conceptual framework.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
Ever since the work of Charles Darwin, evolution of life was
depicted as a huge tree with several big trunks and numerous
branches and twigs. Even when some inconsistencies in evolution
of individual genes were detected, this was largely attributed
to inaccuracies in the methods used for evolutionary
reconstruction. However, the first careful comparisons of the
complete genomes of simple organisms, archaea and bacteria,
showed beyond reasonable doubt that the tree metaphor of life's
evolution was hopelessly flawed because horizontal gene transfer
involves a major fraction of genes in each genome. Thus, the
notion of a tree as an adequate description of organismal
evolution needs to be either abandoned or substantially modified
such that a tree will depict evolution of a small core of genes
minimally prone to horizontal transfer will be overlaid with
connections showing horizontal gene flow.
Eugene V. Koonin, Ph.D., Senior Investigator
National Center for Biotechnology Information
National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD, USA
|
Return to Fast Moving Fronts |
Return to Special Topics main menu
|