|
From
•>>January 2005
Michele Maltoni answers
a few questions about this month's fast moving front in the
field of Physics.
Field: Physics
Article: Status of three-neutrino oscillations after the SNO-salt data
Authors: Maltoni,
M;Schwetz, T;Tortola, MA;Valle, JWF
Journal: PHYS REV D, 6811: (11) 3010-3010, DEC 2003
Addresses: Univ Valencia, CSIC, Inst Fis Corpuscular, Edificio Inst Paterna, Apartado 22085, E-46071 Valencia, Spain.
Univ Valencia, CSIC, Inst Fis Corpuscular, Edificio Inst Paterna, E-46071 Valencia, Spain.
Tech Univ Munich, Dept Phys, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
|
|

Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“In our paper we present a global and unified analysis of all the results of the last generation of neutrino experiments.”
|
|
I believe the paper is highly cited because it provides a
complete overview of the present status of the research in
neutrino phenomenology, one of the "hottest" topics in
modern particle physics. In the last few years, the
high-statistics data provided by the Super-Kamiokande and Sudbury
Neutrino Observatory (SNO) experiments has finally put on a firm
observational basis the fact that neither solar nor atmospheric
neutrino events can be explained within the simplest formulation
of the Standard Model of particle physics. Furthermore, the recent
evidence of anti-neutrino disappearance in the reactor experiment
KamLAND has established for the first time the oscillation
hypothesis with man-produced neutrinos. Nowadays, the observation
of neutrino conversion in solar, atmospheric, and reactor
experiments constitutes the only solid evidence for physics beyond
the Standard Model. The study of neutrino properties is therefore
important since it gives us some hints about the ultimate Theory
of Nature. In our paper we present a global and unified analysis
of all the available neutrino data, thus offering to the reader an
updated summary of the present state-of-the-art in neutrino
phenomenology.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to
others?
Not really. It is more correct to say that in our paper we
review all the major discoveries in neutrino physics of the last
few years, we discuss in detail their compatibility and
complementarity, and we draw conclusions which will be useful in
planning the research in coming years.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
Neutrinos are elementary particles very similar to electrons,
but they have no electric charge and an extremely tiny mass. In
fact, the Standard Model of Particle Theory postulates that
their mass is exactly zero, and until a few years ago there was
no evidence against this assumption. Since their interactions
with matter are extremely weak, they are very difficult to
detect, and the task usually requires very large detectors and
many years of data taking. Neutrinos are known to exist in three
different types, called "flavors": electron neutrino (nu_e),
muon neutrino (nu_mu), and tau neutrino (nu_tau). There are a
number of processes, both in nature and man-produced, where
neutrinos are produced: among them, we highlight nuclear fusion
reactions in the core of the Sun (solar neutrinos, nu_e only),
interaction of cosmic rays with the upper layers of the Earth’s
atmosphere (atmospheric neutrinos, both nu_e and nu_mu), nuclear
fission reactions in nuclear power plants (reactor neutrinos,
nu_e only), and a number of particle interaction processes at
accelerator facilities (accelerator neutrinos, both nu_e and
nu_mu).
Over the last few decades, many experiments have been
designed and built with the purpose of measuring the neutrino
flux coming from different sources, but until a few years ago,
the experimental scenario was still inconclusive, mainly because
different experiments gave contradictory results. This was
mostly due to the fact that, given the very weak interactions of
neutrinos with matter, it is extremely difficult to build a
reliable detector and to calibrate it properly. It is only
during the last 10 years that clear and unambiguous experimental
results have become available, first for atmospheric neutrinos:
(the Super-Kamiokande experiment), and then for solar neutrinos:
(the Super-Kamiokande and SNO experiments). These experiments
have provided conclusive evidence that neither solar nor
atmospheric neutrino data can be reconciled with the theoretical
expectations predicted by the Standard Model, hence a "New
Physics" model is needed. Very recently, these results have
also been confirmed by reactors (KamLAND) and accelerator (K2K)
experiments, which make use of man-produced neutrinos. It is
worth mentioning that, as a coronation of many decades of
research, in 2002, Raymond Davis Jr. of The University of
Pennsylvania and Masatoshi Koshiba of the University of Tokyo
were awarded the Nobel Prize in physics (shared with Riccardo
Giacconi) "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in
particular for the detection of cosmic neutrinos."
In our paper we present a global and unified analysis of all
the results of the last generation of neutrino experiments. The
phenomenological picture emerging from our analysis is rather
well defined. On the one hand, the results of atmospheric
experiments indicate a strong deficit of muon neutrinos with
respect to the theoretical expectations, mainly visible in
neutrinos coming from below the horizon, i.e., those which have
crossed a good fraction of the Earth and have traveled many
thousands of kilometers. The same data also show no visible
deviation of nu_e events, thus suggesting that at the energy
scale and travel distance relevant for contained atmospheric
data—from 100 MeV to about 100 GeV, and from 10 km to 10,000
km—electron neutrinos do not play a relevant role in the
"New Physics processes" responsible for the nu_mu
disappearance. On the other hand, the data collected by solar
experiments show a very strong deficit of electron neutrinos, at
an energy scale of about 5 to 15 MeV. Recently, the SNO
experiment has shown that this disappearance is accompanied by
the appearance of an equal amount of the other two known
neutrino flavors (nu_mu and nu_tau), so that the total number of
neutrinos is conserved. We are therefore in front of a process
of CONVERSION among different neutrino flavors. The most
successful models which can account for ALL the experimental
evidence explain these neutrino conversions by postulating that
at least two of the three known neutrino states have a tiny but
non-zero mass. This hypothesis, together with the assumption
that the flavor eigenstates are not the same as the mass
eigenstates, lead to a PERIODIC conversion among different
flavors: we speak therefore of NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS. In our
work we focus on the simplest of such models, the CP-conserving
three-neutrino oscillation model, discussing in detail how it
succeeds in explaining each of the experimental results and
carefully reconstructing the allowed ranges of its five
parameters (two mass-squared differences and three mixing
angles). In particular, we have put a special emphasis on the
determination of one of the mixing angles, called theta_reactor,
which at the moment is the only parameter of the neutrino mass
matrix to be still unmeasured. Presently, the strongest
constraint on this parameter is an upper bound which proceeds
from the combination of atmospheric and reactor data. However,
in Summer 2003, a reanalysis of the Super-Kamiokande atmospheric
data has resulted in a weakening of this bound. In our work we
have shown that a complementary bound on theta_reactor can also
be obtained from the combination of solar and KamLAND data, thus
increasing the robustness of the present determination of this
parameter.
How
did you become involved in this research?
Michele Maltoni:
During my Ph.D. activity at Ferrara University, I became
aware of the very quick growth undergone in the last few years
by non-accelerator physics. In particular, I was fascinated by
the outstanding results found in the field of neutrino
phenomenology. For this reason, after the completion of my
doctoral thesis I decided to enter the field of neutrino
physics, and in February 2000 I joined the AHEP group in
Valencia, which has had a long and well-consolidated experience
on this subject. Since then, my research activity has mainly
focused on the phenomenological aspects of the neutrino
oscillation problem.
Dr. Michele Maltoni
C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY, USA
Dr. Thomas Schwetz
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati
Trieste, Italy
Mariam Tortola
Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular - CSIC/UVEG
Edificio Institutos de Paterna
Valencia, Spain
Prof. J.W.F. Valle
Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular - CSIC/UVEG
Edificio Institutos de Paterna
Valencia, Spain
|
Return to Fast Moving Fronts |
Return to Special Topics main menu
|