|
From
•>>January 2006
Field:
Social Sciences, general
Article Title: Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war
Authors: Fearon,
JD;Laitin, DD
Journal: AMER POLIT SCI REV
Volume: 97
Page: 75-90
Year: FEB 2003
* Stanford Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
* Stanford Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
|
|
James Fearon adds a
few new thoughts to his previously featured commentary on this
paper which was the Fast Breaking Paper in Social Sciences,
general for October 2004. Read the October
2004 comment.
What
are the social or political implications of your research?
Peacekeeping operations to civil war-torn countries with low
state capabilities are likely to fail unless
"peacekeeping" becomes successful state building. Where
civil war was caused by, or facilitated the destruction of central
government institutions, mediating social and policy differences
among different groups may be insufficient to bring about a viable
peace.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
The remarkable spread of persistent civil war in the poorest
countries of the world has had little to do with ethnic
demographics, religious hatreds, economic inequality, dependence
on primary commodity exports, or even absence of political rights.
Instead, it mainly reflects the success of a set of military
techniques—rural guerrilla warfare—in poor countries whose
state administrative and police capabilities are weak and
underdeveloped. The best predictors of a higher probability of
civil war onset are low per capita income, a large population,
recent independence, mountainous terrain, oil production, and
recent change in the level of democracy.
James Fearon, Ph.D.
Professor of Political Science,
Stanford University,
Department of Political Science,
Stanford, CA, USA
|
Return to Fast Moving Fronts |
Return to Special Topics main menu
|