|
Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
First, Mutually Unbiased Bases (MUB’s), the primary topic
of the paper, represent a fundamental concept in quantum
mechanics and information, and relate to the minimum sets of
experiments one needs to extract the maximum amount of
information from a quantum state.


“The paper
describes a new methodology for attacking a very
challenging mathematical problem, which
originates naturally in the context of quantum
mechanics”
|
|
Second, MUB’s are critical to several quantum
cryptographic protocols and systems, including the
much-studied Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) system; in
particular,
one can provide increased security and bit rates by using
states corresponding to MUB’s of multi-dimensional quantum
systems.
Third, the mathematical problem of determining a set of
MUB’s of maximum cardinality for any d-dimensional quantum
system is a challenging one, with connections to many well-
known problems in combinatorics and algebra. For example,
the MUB problem is closely related to the problem of
determining arrangements of lines in the Grassmannian spaces
so that they are as far apart as possible.
Our paper provides a fresh perspective on this
challenging and relevant problem. In particular, we provide
a construction of a set of MUB’s of maximum size when the
dimension is a power of prime. While the existence of such
MUB’s was already reported in the literature, we provide a
very different construction and also make connections to
maximal commuting bases of orthogonal unitary matrices, and
other related problems.
This fresh perspective, along with the open problem of
determining sets of MUB’s of maximum size for dimensions
that are not powers of prime numbers, has fueled a lot of
interest in this field following the publication of our
paper. For example, even for a six-dimensional system, the
maximum size of a set of MUB’s is not known.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis
of knowledge?
The paper describes a new methodology for attacking a
very challenging mathematical problem, which originates
naturally in the context of quantum mechanics. Other
than providing novel and explicit constructions for MUB
observables (operators), the paper raises hopes that one
might be able to obtain an answer to the question of
determining MUB sets of maximum size when the dimension
is not a power of prime.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in
layman’s terms?
Fundamental to quantum mechanics and quantum
information theory is the question: How much can one
learn about a given ensemble of quantum states, and how
efficiently can one distinguish among different
ensembles, corresponding to different quantum states?
Since learning about an unknown quantum state
necessarily implies a change or disturbance in the
observed state, a related question concerns the
associated tradeoff: how much information one gets vs.
how much the state itself is disturbed. MUB’s are
intrinsically related to such fundamental questions.
For example, consider the scenario in which one is
randomly presented with quantum states drawn from two
bases that are mutually unbiased. One can show that if
one can accurately determine the states from one of the
given bases, then one must disturb the states of the
other basis considerably. Thus, if a sender randomly
sends states chosen from two MUB’s, then an eavesdropper
trying to accurately learn which state was sent would
get caught: if the sender can accurately predict the
states belonging to one of the bases, then the sender
would disturb the states from the other bases, which can
then be detected by the receiver at the other end.
This result forms the basis of the quantum key
distribution (QKD) paradigm, which specifies a secure
protocol for sharing secret keys over a quantum (e.g.,
optical) channel. By studying constructions of sets of
MUB’s for different dimensional systems, the paper
furthers the understanding of such states, and also
opens up the possibility of utilizing high-dimensional
quantum states for information transmission and
processing purposes.
How did you become involved in this research, and were there
obstacles along the way?
This work evolved naturally from our group’s interest
in quantum computing and quantum information processing.
At the time, we were exploring topics such as the design
of protocols for various cryptographic tasks, as well as
developing tools to analyze the security aspects of
given protocols.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
Nothing that is remarkable, other than the conjecture
that physical systems seem to be somehow "aware" of
prime numbers. For quantum systems with dimensions that
are powers of a prime one can find sets of MUB’s with
maximum size. While there is no proof, the conjecture is
that for general composite dimensional systems—for
example, when the systems have dimension 6—such maximum
size MUB sets do not exist. If such a conjecture is
indeed true, it might have interesting philosophical
implications.
Vwani P. Roychowdhury, Ph.D.
Professor of Electrical Engineering
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D.
Laboratoire d'Informatique Theorique
et Quantique Department d'informatique
et Recherche Operationnelle
Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|