|
From
•>>September 2006
Frederick
S. vom Saal answers
a few questions about this month's fast moving front in the
field of Environment/Ecology.
The author has also sent along images of their work.
Field: Environment/Ecology
Article: Estrogenic chemicals in plastic and oral contraceptives disrupt development of the fetal mouse prostate and urethra
Authors: Timms, BG;Howdeshell, KL;Barton, L;Bradley, S;Richter,
CA;Vom Saal, FS
Journal: PROC NAT ACAD SCI USA, 102 (19): 7014-7019, MAY 10 2005
Addresses: Univ Missouri, Div Biol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Univ Missouri, Div Biol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Univ S Dakota, Sch Med, Div Basic Biomed Sci, Vermillion, SD 57069 USA.
|
|
Why do you think your
paper is highly cited?
Our paper concerned the adverse effects on development of the
prostate and urethra in male mouse fetuses as a result of fetal
exposure to drugs and chemicals in the environment that are potent
estrogens.
We fed pregnant mice a chemical, bisphenol A (BPA), at a dose 5
times lower than the dose that the US-EPA currently states is a
safe daily intake amount for humans (called the reference dose).
According to findings from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and other research, the amount of BPA in 95% of people
in the USA exceeds the amount of BPA that would result from the
dose we administered in this study.
|

“...DES is a known human
carcinogen and, in addition to causing cancer, DES caused reproductive
system abnormalities in millions of people whose mothers were
administered this drug during pregnancy (due to the mistaken
assumption that it would prevent miscarriage; this use was banned in
1972).”
|
|
We also fed pregnant mice a dose of the estrogenic drug used in
birth control pills, ethinylestradiol, and our dose was
approximately 5-times below the dose in birth control pills.
Approximately two million women using birth control pills are
estimated to become pregnant each year in the USA and Europe, and
these women continue taking the pills until they finally realize
that they are pregnant. Human fetuses are thus commonly exposed to
this drug at doses higher than those we used in this study.
We found that the estrogenic drug ethinylestradiol and the
chemical used to make polycarbonate plastic, BPA, caused an
identical malformation of the urethra at the bladder-urethra
junction (a marked constriction), suggesting that fetal exposure
to these chemicals could result in bladder outlet obstruction
disease.
We also showed that the chemicals stimulated an increase in
prostate size due to stimulation of a type of cell—the basal
epithelial cell—which is implicated in the development of
prostate cancer later in life.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis
of knowledge?
The method used in this study was developed by Dr. Barry Timms,
Professor of Biomedical Sciences at the University of South Dakota
School of Medicine, who was the first author of the published
article.
This technique involves removing the fetal prostate and
urethra, sectioning the tissue, and then scanning each section
into a computer while providing a unique code for each region
being examined. The computer program then reconstructs the organ,
and we can conduct analyses of the size and shape of the different
structures.
Subsequently, we also conduct histochemical analysis on the
sections to determine which types of cells and which genes and
proteins in the cells are being altered. This is an extremely
powerful approach, since you can actually see the changes in fetal
cells and organs at the molecular through the entire organ level.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
The chemical BPA was found to be able to be linked together to
create polycarbonate plastic and the resin lining of metal cans in
the early 1950s. However, BPA was shown to be an
estrogen-mimicking endocrine-disrupting chemical many years prior
to the discovery that it could be used to make plastic.
BPA was first considered for use as an estrogenic drug by Sir
Charles Edward Dodds in the 1930s, prior to his synthesis of the
drug diethylstilbestrol (DES), which is structurally and
functionally similar to BPA. This is important because DES is a
known human carcinogen and, in addition to causing cancer, DES
caused reproductive system abnormalities in millions of people
whose mothers were administered this drug during pregnancy (due to
the mistaken assumption that it would prevent miscarriage; this
use was banned in 1972).
We used the drug DES as our "positive control"
estrogen, since there is a large published literature describing
the virtually identical harm it causes in mice and humans due to
exposure during fetal life. The fact that BPA and DES, as well as
ethinylestradiol, all caused the same abnormalities in prostate
and urethra development thus should not be surprising, but now
that this has been clearly demonstrated, the level of concern
about exposure of human fetuses to BPA and ethinylestradiol has
increased.
How did you become involved in this research, and were there
obstacles along the way?
Dr. Timms and I met a number of years ago and began
collaborating due to our mutual interest in examining the
potential for the disrupting effects of estrogenic chemicals and
drugs on development of the prostate, as well as the rest of the
male reproductive and urogenital system.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
Bisphenol A is now produced in excess of 6 billion pounds per
year and is one of the highest volume chemicals in worldwide
production. The chemical bond linking BPA molecules in
polycarbonate plastic and resins is unstable, particularly when
exposed to heat. The amount of leaching of BPA into the
environment from numerous common household products and into food
and beverages from containers (that are typically described as
microwave safe) is great enough to lead to significant levels of
exposure of virtually everyone in the world who has been examined,
including high levels in pregnant women and fetuses.
Over the past few years a wide range of adverse effects in
laboratory animals due to exposure to BPA has been reported in
peer-reviewed published studies conducted by scientists not
associated with chemical corporations. In response, chemical
corporations have engaged in a strategy referred to as
"manufactured uncertainty," originally developed by the
tobacco industry, and 100% of chemical industry-funded studies
report that BPA causes no adverse effects.
The approach by corporations of producing "science"
that always shows your product to be safe has been successful in
blocking attempts to restrict the uses of BPA by governments and
regulatory agencies. Exposure of fetuses and babies to BPA is of
special concern, since developmental abnormalities are permanent.
Regarding birth control pills, millions of women taking birth
control pills are not diligent about taking the pills regularly,
and thus become pregnant (taken regularly, the pills are effective
in most women). Physicians are not adequately warning women about
the need to be diligent with regard to taking birth control pills,
due to the potential dangers associated with fetal exposure to
estrogenic drugs, even though the harm to human fetuses due to
exposure to DES is well known.
Because women taking birth control pills do not expect to
become pregnant, they often continue taking the pills for an
extended period of time. Our findings in mice reveal a significant
adverse consequence for male mouse fetuses of exposure to a very
low dose of the estrogenic drug in birth control pills. The fact
that DES caused the same harm in mouse and human fetuses, and our
finding that ethinylestradiol and DES (as well as BPA) caused the
same effects in mice, suggests that there should be a greater
level of concern with exposure of human fetuses to the chemicals
in birth control pills and plastic.
Frederick S. vom Saal, Ph.D.
Professor of Biology
Division of Biological Sciences
University of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, USA
Web
Site
All external sites will open in a new browser.
The Thomson Corporation and esi-topics.com does not endorse external sites.
|
|
A Closer Look...
|
 |
Below
are images sent in by Frederick S. vom Saal which correspond with the featured
paper, or current research. |
|
|
Figure 1:

|
|
Figure
1: Serial section reconstruction of the urogenital sinus (UGS), which develops into the urethra and prostate, from gestation day 19 male moues fetuses exposed to low doses of estrogenic chemicals: diethylstilbestrol, bisphenol A and ethinylestradiol by feeding the chemical to the pregnant mother. The UGS depicted for each treatment was closest to the group mean for prostate duct number and size. All images are viewed from a left-lateral perspective. The upper images (Panel A) illustrate the differences in patterns of prostate ductal development following fetal exposure to these chemicals compared to control, untreated animals. There is a significant increase in both the total number of ducts in estrogen treated animals with a corresponding increase in overall prostate volume, particularly in the dorsal (DP) and lateral (LP) regions. The lower images (Panel B) show the marked alteration in the shape of the urethra (U) in the region of the bladder neck (BN), which is markedly constricted (*) in the mice exposed to the estrogenic chemicals, compared to controls. In addition, the region of the UGS associated with the development of the dorsolateral buds (the prostatic sulcus or colliculus – arrow) is enlarged, particularly by bisphenol A, compared to controls. Ventral prostate (VP). Bar = 100 µm. |
|
| |
|
|
Figure 2:

|
|
Figure
2: A histological section showing the initial development and growth of prostatic duct epithelium in a male mouse fetus on gestation day 19. The estrogenic chemicals act on mesenchyme cells, which express receptors for estrogen, and in response to estrogen stimulation release growth factors that control the differentiation and growth of the basal epithelial cells lining the prostate ducts that form as outgrowths from the urethra. |
|
| |
|
|
Return to Fast Moving Fronts |
Return to Special Topics main menu
|