This was one of the first meta-analyses of neuropsychological
results for adults with ADHD.
The study provides a succinct and useful summary of these
neuropsychological results of over 25 studies.
Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that’s
useful to others?
It summarizes an existing body of research. It is useful to
others because the primary results of these pre-existing studies
are summarized.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
The paper primarily found that adults with ADHD have deficits
in several areas of brain functioning. These deficits are similar
to areas that have been found to be abnormal among children and
adolescents.
This speaks to the developmental consistency of ADHD as a
diagnosis and suggests that the brain dysfunction that underlies
the manifestation of ADHD-like behaviors is similar across
development.
This developmental consistency in neuropsychological
dysfunction, along with other studies reports of developmental
consistency in treatment response, symptom presentation,
impairment, etc., provides further evidence of the validity of
this disorder among adults.
How did you become involved in this research and were there
successes or failures?
I became involved in this research primarily out of an interest
in learning more about the underlying brain dysfunction that might
cause ADHD behaviors.
Neuropsychological tasks are an effective method for measuring
brain function and determining what areas of the brain might be
dysfunctional.
I noticed that the number of studies examining
neuropsychological functioning in adults with ADHD was quite
minimal. I therefore began implementing those neuropsychological
paradigms that were shown to be abnormal among children with ADHD
in adults with ADHD.
Jeffery N. Epstein, Ph.D.
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, OH, USA