|
Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
“Our work helps explain how brain cells
communicate.” |
|
|
|
|
This article in Nature describes, for the first
time, modulation of synaptic transmission by a
neurotransmitter receptor auxiliary subunit. This work has
enjoyed unusually high impact because the auxiliary subunit,
stargazin, modulates the function of AMPA type glutamate
receptors, which are the major neurotransmitter receptor
types in the brain.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
This work represents an important and unexpected
discovery. Previous work suggested that synaptic
transmission by AMPA receptors was dictated only by the
principle glutamate receptor subunits. Our work demonstrated
that stargazin-type auxiliary subunits also play a
fundamental role in shaping synaptic transmission.
Would you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
Our work helps explain how brain cells communicate. The
primary neurotransmitter used for this communication is
glutamate. Our work shows that glutamate receptors do not
work alone and that a new auxiliary subunit named "stargazin"
also participates. Glutamate receptors mediate fundamental
aspects of learning and memory and abnormal glutamate
receptor function underlies several neurological and
psychiatric diseases. Therefore, this work has broad
implications.
How did you become involved in this research and were there any
particular problems encountered along the way?
Our team in this work, which includes, as full partner,
Dr. Roger Nicoll at UCSF, became interested in stargazin, as
this protein is mutated in "stargazer" mice. These mice
suffer from absence epilepsy and cerebellar ataxia. These
defects owe to a loss of functional AMPA receptors in
specific neuronal types.
Our team determined that this loss of AMPA receptors
reflects the fact that stargazin serves as an auxiliary
subunit of neuronal AMPA receptors. The scientific community
initially questioned this interpretation, as no other
neurotransmitter-gated ion channels have known auxiliary
subunits. However, this Nature article provides
unequivocal proof.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
Further studies of the stargazin gene family should
provide insights into mechanisms controlling glutamate
receptor function and synaptic transmission. This work has
important implications for both science and medicine. Also,
it will be important to learn whether other neurotransmitter
receptors also have crucial auxiliary subunits.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
As with any fundamental discovery regarding neuronal
function, our work has significance for understanding brain
physiology and disease. Because glutamate is the major
neurotransmitter in the brain, one can anticipate diverse
implications.
David S. Bredt, M.D., Ph.D.
Vice President, Integrative Biology
Lilly Research Laboratories
Indianapolis, IN, USA
 |
|
|
- Read an
interview with David S. Bredt in the Scientists category of
in-cites.com.
|
|