|
Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
The publication of this paper coincided with the
increasing need worldwide, and especially in Europe, to find
environmental tools able to determine marine quality. In
this particular case, the marine benthic communities
constitute one of the elements which best reflects
anthropogenic impacts.
|

“We are
trying to improve the methodology and also to
develop new methods, applicable to hard-bottom
substrata as well as to other elements of the
ecosystem.” |
|
We developed an index of quality (AMBI), which has since
been applied to different anthropogenic impacts in many
geographical areas—throughout Europe, Uruguay, Brazil,
Morocco, China, USA, Mexico, Turkey, Indonesia, etc.
Together with this paper we decided to develop free software
which made it easier to calculate and to represent the
index, which probably has helped to spread the use of the
AMBI index.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
The AMBI index is based upon previous ecological models
and its theoretical basis is that of the ecological adaptive
strategies of the r, k and T, (McArthur and Wilson, 1967;
Pianka, 1970; and Gray, 1979) and the ecological succession
in stressed environments (Bellan, 1967; Pearson and
Rosenberg, 1978; and Salen-Picard, 1983). However, the most
novel contribution of the AMBI was a formula permitting the
derivation of a series of continuous values. This allows
scientists to readily show the quality of a location to
policy makers and stakeholders.
Would you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
The AMBI offers a "pollution or disturbance
classification" of a particular site, representing the
soft-bottom benthic community "health." This is very
important in terms of management of marine habitats and also
in assessing the ecological and environmental status of
marine ecosystems.
How did you become involved in this research and were there any
particular problems encountered along the way?
My background is in benthic ecology, and, at AZTI, I have
been involved for several years in marine monitoring and
ecological assessment. One of the problems we faced was
related to the absence of ecological tools able to determine
and illustrate, in a simple way, the impact on marine
systems. We need these kinds of tools both for marine
monitoring and marine environmental impact assessment.
Hence, the team involved in the research (Víctor Pérez,
Javier Franco and Ángel Borja) decided to try and develop
just such a method in order to help other scientists with
the task of making complicated biological data accessible to
stakeholders.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
We are trying to improve the methodology and also to
develop new methods, applicable to hard-bottom substrata as
well as to other elements of the ecosystem. We are also
working in the use of these kinds of tools within the
European Water Framework Directive, and we have developed a
"sister" approach (multivariate-AMBI or M-AMBI), which has
been recently published, with the software being made
available at
www.azti.es.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
Yes, this research has been applied to the implementation
of the European Water Framework Directive. Many countries
have adopted this methodology in their marine assessments,
or have adapted it to their particular needs.
Ángel Borja, Ph.D
AZTI-Tecnalia
Marine Research Division
Pasaia, Spain
|
|
A Closer Look...
|
 |
Below
are images sent in by Angel Borja which correspond with the featured
paper, or current research. |
|
|
Figure 1:
 |
|
Figure
1:
This is the
ecological basis of AMBI. To increasing
gradients of pollution or disturbance correspond
a change in the proportion of the ecological
groups (I to V), to which each species is
assigned. The AMBI values provide an
approximation to the disturbance of the area. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Figure 2a:
 Figure 2b:
 |
|
Figures 2a and 2b:
This is an
application to the impact produced by drill
cuttings from an oil platform in the North Sea.
The impact decreases with the distance to the
well (2a), and this impact is related to the
total hydrocarbon concentration (2b). |
|
| |
|