Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Ben Bolstad

ESI Special Topics, July 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2004/july-04-BenBolstad.html

Ben Bolstad answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the field of Computer Science.


From •>>July 2004

Field: Computer Science
Article Title: A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias
Authors: Bolstad, BM;Irizarry, RA;Astrand, M;Speed, TP - see also
Journal: BIOINFORMATICS
Volume: 19
Page: 185-193
Year: JAN 22 2003
* Univ Calif Berkeley, Grp Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
* Univ Calif Berkeley, Grp Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
* Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
* AstraZeneca, R&D, Molndal, Sweden.
* Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
* WEHI, Div Genet & Bioinformat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?


This paper presents a number of normalization algorithms and compares their performance using microarray data.”

Microarray analysis is a field that many researchers are interested in. The quantile normalization method outlined in the paper is both effective and can be used to process a large number of arrays efficiently.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to others?

This paper presents a new methodology. It describes procedures for normalizing Affymetrix probe-level microarray data and compares their effects on gene expression estimates.

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?

When a microarray experiment is carried out there are two major sources of variation: biological and non-biological. Only the first is of interest, with ideally the non-biological variability being small. Typically, sources of technical variability—for example the settings on the scanner, the amount of cRNA hybridized to the array and the order in which the arrays are hybridized—contribute to this unwanted variation. A normalization procedure attempts to reduce this unwanted variability without also removing the biological differences we are seeking to identify.

This paper presents a number of normalization algorithms and compares their performance using microarray data. After normalization you'd like the variability of non-differential genes to be reduced without also losing the differential genes. We found that methods which used the complete dataset to establish the normalization were superior to those which normalized to a single baseline array. The quantile normalization method was the fastest of the complete data methods and proved to be effective in the bias and variance comparisons.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research?

I became involved with this research as part of my doctoral studies. It is one component of our work on the RMA expression measure for Affymetrix oligonucleotide data.End

Ben Bolstad, Ph.D.
Biostatistics
University of California
Berkeley, CA, USA

ESI Special Topics, July 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2004/july-04-BenBolstad.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.