By Anat Reiner
ESI Special Topics,
March 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2004/march-04-AnatReiner.html
|
Anat Reiner answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Computer Science.
From
•>>March 2004
[late entry]
Field:
Computer Science
Article Title: Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures
Authors: Reiner,
A;Yekutieli, D;Benjamini, Y
Journal: BIOINFORMATICS
Volume: 19
Page: 368-375
Year: FEB 12 2003
* Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Exact Sci, Dept Stat & Operat
Res, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.
* Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Exact Sci, Dept Stat & Operat
Res, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
The paper provides a solution to a widely acknowledged and urgent
statistical problem, regarding a most useful research technique in
genetics, the use of which is spreading fast.
|

“In recent years new extremely large problems emerged in different branches of science, and we realized that the FDR approach is the only practical way to address them”
|
|
Another good reason for its fast popularity in citing is the
relatively long time that has passed since we first talked publicly
about our solution and when the paper appeared in print—the delay
was our own fault.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to
others?
The paper describes a new methodology for the statistical
analysis of gene expression data using microarray technology.
What
were some of the circumstances that led you to do this research?
The False Discovery Rate (FDR) has been offered as an alternative
to the traditional approaches to multiple hypotheses testing. In
recent years, new extremely large problems emerged in different
branches of science, and we realized that the FDR approach is the
only practical way to address them. In particular we argued that the
FDR approach is very appropriate for the analysis of microarray
data. One of us became deeply involved in the practical analysis of
microarray datasets. She realized the need for further research into
the appropriateness and implementation of the FDR methodology in the
particularities of microarray analysis, as well as the importance of
reporting the results to the community of potential users.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
It may happen that a gene will be discovered as differentially
expressed in two biological situations even though the difference is
merely due to natural variability in process and measurement. Since
microarray data includes genetic expression on thousands of genes,
often in numerous biological conditions, it becomes too likely that
a gene will be falsely discovered as differentially expressed.
Traditional statistical methods to cope with this problem try to
keep the probability of making even a single false discovery very
low—at the expense of requiring a very high threshold for calling
a gene differentially expressed.
The FDR approach instead controls the expected proportion of
false discoveries among the discovered genes. The procedures offered
in the paper do so under the special dependency structure typical to
microarray analysis. They result in less stringent thresholds,
offering researchers a pool of discovered genes on which to continue
research, without wasting too large a proportion of their efforts on
non-relevant genes.
Anat Reiner, Daniel Yekutieli, and Yoav Benjamini
Department of Statistics and Operations Research
The Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences
Tel-Aviv University
Tel-Aviv, Israel
|
ESI Special Topics,
March 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2004/march-04-AnatReiner.html
|
|
|