Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Jules Hoffmann

ESI Special Topics, March 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/january-05-JulesHoffmann.html

Jules Hoffmann answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the Multidisciplinary field.


From •>>March 2005

Field: Multidisciplinary
Article Title: The immune response of Drosophila
Authors: Hoffmann, JA
Journal: NATURE
Volume: 426
Page: 33-38
Year: NOV 6 2003
* CNRS, Inst Biol Mol & Cellulaire, F-67084 Strasbourg, France.
* CNRS, Inst Biol Mol & Cellulaire, F-67084 Strasbourg, France.

The paper published in Nature/426 on Nov. 6th 2003 reviews our present understanding of the host defense of the fruitfly Drosophila. Since the early ‘90s, this insect has appeared as a remarkably informative model for the study of innate immunity, i.e., the first-line immune defense against microorganisms. Mammals rely both on innate defense mechanisms and on an adaptive response. The hallmarks of the latter are the generation of a vast array of immune receptors by somatic rearrangement of gene fragments in lymphocytes, clonal expansion, and memory. These facets most probably evolved in ancestral bony fish and are absent in the fruitfly, which depends only on innate immune response to fight off infections. Hence Drosophila indeed represents a pristine model for addressing the primary role of innate immunity, a field of study neglected during the second half of the 20th century.


“TLRs now appear as essential sentinels of the innate immune system in mammals and their activation by diverse microbial ligands further significantly contributes to stimulation of adaptive immune responses.”

The exquisite possibilities of Drosophila genetics, the ease of transgenesis, and the recent sequencing of the genome all have contributed to the rapid development of our basic knowledge on the mechanisms by which the fruitfly responds to fungal and bacterial infections and which are reviewed in the article. We have now gained a basic understanding on how the fly senses infectious organisms and discriminates between various classes of infecting agents (e.g. fungi, Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria). Further we have learned how this sensing may lead to activation of signaling pathways in immune responsive cells which ultimately control expression of effector genes through members of the NF-k B family of inducible transactivators. Of particular interest in the field was the discovery that sensing of fungal and Gram-positive bacterial infection in Drosophila induces NF-k B dependent gene expression via a transmembrane receptor named Toll. This result led to the search for mammalian homologues of Toll and has contributed to the discovery of a family of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in mice and humans. TLRs now appear as essential sentinels of the innate immune system in mammals and their activation by diverse microbial ligands further significantly contributes to stimulation of adaptive immune responses. The paper reviews these data and compares our present knowledge on antimicrobial defenses in the fly and innate defenses in mammals, highlighting the impressive similarities, but also outlining some crucial differences.

Many of the significant results on fruitfly immunity were obtained over the last decade in the laboratory of the author of the review. This group had a long tradition of studies on endocrine control of development and reproduction in insects and had noted, like many entomologists, that transplantation and excision experiments performed under septic conditions never led to wound infection. This prompted the conclusion that insects must have strong antimicrobial defenses, which indeed had already been perceived by workers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Furthermore, the role of inducible antimicrobial peptides had been described in 1980 by the Boman group in Sweden, and the time appeared ripe around 1990 to use Drosophila molecular genetics to address the problems of sensing, signaling, and gene transcription during the host defense.End

Jules A. Hoffmann, M.D., Ph.D. 
Directeur, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire 
CNRS 
Strasbourg, France

ESI Special Topics, March 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/january-05-JulesHoffmann.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.