|
Jules Hoffmann answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the Multidisciplinary field.
From
•>>March 2005
Field:
Multidisciplinary
Article Title: The immune response of Drosophila
Authors: Hoffmann, JA
Journal: NATURE
Volume: 426
Page: 33-38
Year: NOV 6 2003
* CNRS, Inst Biol Mol & Cellulaire, F-67084 Strasbourg, France.
* CNRS, Inst Biol Mol & Cellulaire, F-67084 Strasbourg, France.
|
The paper published in Nature/426
on Nov. 6th 2003 reviews our present understanding of the
host defense of the fruitfly Drosophila. Since the early ‘90s,
this insect has appeared as a remarkably informative model for the
study of innate immunity, i.e., the first-line immune defense against
microorganisms. Mammals rely both on innate defense mechanisms and on
an adaptive response. The hallmarks of the latter are the generation
of a vast array of immune receptors by somatic rearrangement of gene
fragments in lymphocytes, clonal expansion, and memory. These facets
most probably evolved in ancestral bony fish and are absent in the
fruitfly, which depends only on innate immune response to fight off
infections. Hence Drosophila indeed represents a pristine model
for addressing the primary role of innate immunity, a field of study
neglected during the second half of the 20th century.
|

“TLRs now appear as essential sentinels of the innate immune system in mammals and their activation by diverse microbial ligands further significantly contributes to stimulation of adaptive immune responses.”
|
|
The exquisite possibilities of Drosophila genetics, the ease
of transgenesis, and the recent sequencing of the genome all have
contributed to the rapid development of our basic knowledge on the
mechanisms by which the fruitfly responds to fungal and bacterial
infections and which are reviewed in the article. We have now gained a
basic understanding on how the fly senses infectious organisms and
discriminates between various classes of infecting agents (e.g. fungi,
Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria). Further we have learned how
this sensing may lead to activation of signaling pathways in immune
responsive cells which ultimately control expression of effector genes
through members of the NF-k B family of
inducible transactivators. Of particular interest in the field was the
discovery that sensing of fungal and Gram-positive bacterial infection
in Drosophila induces NF-k B
dependent gene expression via a transmembrane receptor named Toll.
This result led to the search for mammalian homologues of Toll and has
contributed to the discovery of a family of Toll-like receptors (TLR)
in mice and humans. TLRs now appear as essential sentinels of the
innate immune system in mammals and their activation by diverse
microbial ligands further significantly contributes to stimulation of
adaptive immune responses. The paper reviews these data and compares
our present knowledge on antimicrobial defenses in the fly and innate
defenses in mammals, highlighting the impressive similarities, but
also outlining some crucial differences.
Many of the significant results on fruitfly immunity were obtained
over the last decade in the laboratory of the author of the review.
This group had a long tradition of studies on endocrine control of
development and reproduction in insects and had noted, like many
entomologists, that transplantation and excision experiments performed
under septic conditions never led to wound infection. This prompted
the conclusion that insects must have strong antimicrobial defenses,
which indeed had already been perceived by workers in the late 19th
and early 20th centuries. Furthermore, the role of
inducible antimicrobial peptides had been described in 1980 by the
Boman group in Sweden, and the time appeared ripe around 1990 to use Drosophila
molecular genetics to address the problems of sensing, signaling, and
gene transcription during the host defense.
Jules A. Hoffmann, M.D., Ph.D.
Directeur, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire
CNRS
Strasbourg, France
|
ESI Special Topics,
March 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/january-05-JulesHoffmann.html
|
|