By Hein T.C. van Stokkom, Antonius J.M. Smits, & Rob S.E.W. Leuven
ESI Special Topics,
November 2006
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2006/november-06-vanStokkom_Smits_Leuven.html
|
Hein T.C. van Stokkom, Antonius J.M. Smits, & Rob S.E.W. Leuven
answer a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Engineering.
From
•>>November 2006
Field:
Engineering
Article Title: Flood defense in the Netherlands - A new era, a new approach
Authors: van Stokkom, HTC;Smits, AJM;Leuven, RSEW
Journal: WATER INT
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Page: 76-87
Year: MAR 2005
* Minist Transport, Publ Works & Water Management, Arnhem, Netherlands.
* Minist Transport, Publ Works & Water Management, Arnhem, Netherlands.
* Radboud Univ, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
* Erasmus Univ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
* Radboud Univ, Inst Wetland & Water Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Recent disasters, such as the severe floods along the rivers
Rhine, Meuse, Elbe, and Odra in Europe and hurricane Katrina in the
United States have brought us down to earth. Each disaster causes us
to rethink the way we have dealt with the problems in the past. The
high water discharges of the rivers Rhine and Meuse in 1993, 1995,
and 1998 caused a considerable change in Dutch governmental policy,
public awareness, and international cooperation in terms of flood
defense and inland water management. The paper discusses novel
approaches to flood risk management (e.g., room for the rivers and a
three-step strategy retaining-storing-draining of water) and related
scientific developments.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?
The paper synthesizes and evaluates the current body of knowledge
about sustainable flood defense in the Netherlands. It describes an
abrupt change in thinking about water management and land use. In
the traditional approach water management focused on modifying
natural water systems by engineering works (river regulations, dams,
dikes, water reservoirs, etc.). In the modern (ecosystem-based) view
on water management the focal point is on adapting land use
(agriculture, housing, and infrastructure) to river dynamics.
|
|
|
|
“The paper discusses novel approaches to flood risk management (e.g., room for the rivers and a three-step strategy retaining-storing-draining of water) and related scientific developments.”
|
|
This new way of thinking requires a new field of technical
challenges such as inland dike reallocation, floating houses, river
bypasses near urban areas etc. Additionally, in the modern water
management approach public participation and "river basin wide
thinking" are important corner stones to realize sustainable
flood protection and water use in general. This causes a shift in
the role of the technical engineer in the decision making process
from "determining and directing" to "supportive and
facilitating."
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
If natural systems such as rivers are over-regulated by
engineering works, all kinds of side effects emerge on the short as
well as long term which may also cause an increase in flood
disasters and water scarcity problems. At present, more efforts are
made to modify land use to prevent far-reaching interventions in
river basins. This triggers a new series of technical innovations to
adapt land use, such as housing, agriculture, and infrastructure, to
river dynamics. In applying these new concepts, socio-economic
aspects and public participation play an important role.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there obstacles
along the way?
Floods and near-floods events in Europe during the last decades
triggered our research activities. We did not experience obstacles
during the research and writing of the manuscript.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
There are many social and political implications if the
ecosystem-based approach is applied fully to river basins. The new
way of thinking about land use and water management may cause a
change of livelihoods, influence physical planning, and trigger new
technical and non-technical innovations in land use and water
management measures and transboundary cooperation within river
basins.
Hein T.C. van Stokkom
Waterboard Brabantse Delta
Breda, The Netherlands
Antonius J.M. Smits
Centre for Sustainable Management of Resources
Institute for Science, Innovation and Society
Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Rob S.E.W. Leuven
Department of Environmental Science
Institute for Wetland and Water Research
Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
|
ESI Special Topics,
November 2006
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2006/november-06-vanStokkom_Smits_Leuven.html
|
|
|