Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Hein T.C. van Stokkom, Antonius J.M. Smits, & Rob S.E.W. Leuven

ESI Special Topics, November 2006
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2006/november-06-vanStokkom_Smits_Leuven.html

Hein T.C. van Stokkom, Antonius J.M. Smits, & Rob S.E.W. Leuven answer a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the field of Engineering.


From •>>November 2006

Field: Engineering
Article Title: Flood defense in the Netherlands - A new era, a new approach
Authors: van Stokkom, HTC;Smits, AJM;Leuven, RSEW
Journal: WATER INT
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Page: 76-87
Year: MAR 2005
* Minist Transport, Publ Works & Water Management, Arnhem, Netherlands.
* Minist Transport, Publ Works & Water Management, Arnhem, Netherlands.
* Radboud Univ, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
* Erasmus Univ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
* Radboud Univ, Inst Wetland & Water Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

Recent disasters, such as the severe floods along the rivers Rhine, Meuse, Elbe, and Odra in Europe and hurricane Katrina in the United States have brought us down to earth. Each disaster causes us to rethink the way we have dealt with the problems in the past. The high water discharges of the rivers Rhine and Meuse in 1993, 1995, and 1998 caused a considerable change in Dutch governmental policy, public awareness, and international cooperation in terms of flood defense and inland water management. The paper discusses novel approaches to flood risk management (e.g., room for the rivers and a three-step strategy retaining-storing-draining of water) and related scientific developments.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?

The paper synthesizes and evaluates the current body of knowledge about sustainable flood defense in the Netherlands. It describes an abrupt change in thinking about water management and land use. In the traditional approach water management focused on modifying natural water systems by engineering works (river regulations, dams, dikes, water reservoirs, etc.). In the modern (ecosystem-based) view on water management the focal point is on adapting land use (agriculture, housing, and infrastructure) to river dynamics.

vanStokkom Smits

Leuven

The paper discusses novel approaches to flood risk management (e.g., room for the rivers and a three-step strategy retaining-storing-draining of water) and related scientific developments.”

This new way of thinking requires a new field of technical challenges such as inland dike reallocation, floating houses, river bypasses near urban areas etc. Additionally, in the modern water management approach public participation and "river basin wide thinking" are important corner stones to realize sustainable flood protection and water use in general. This causes a shift in the role of the technical engineer in the decision making process from "determining and directing" to "supportive and facilitating."

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?

If natural systems such as rivers are over-regulated by engineering works, all kinds of side effects emerge on the short as well as long term which may also cause an increase in flood disasters and water scarcity problems. At present, more efforts are made to modify land use to prevent far-reaching interventions in river basins. This triggers a new series of technical innovations to adapt land use, such as housing, agriculture, and infrastructure, to river dynamics. In applying these new concepts, socio-economic aspects and public participation play an important role.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research, and were there obstacles along the way?

Floods and near-floods events in Europe during the last decades triggered our research activities. We did not experience obstacles during the research and writing of the manuscript.

ST:  Are there any social or political implications for your research?

There are many social and political implications if the ecosystem-based approach is applied fully to river basins. The new way of thinking about land use and water management may cause a change of livelihoods, influence physical planning, and trigger new technical and non-technical innovations in land use and water management measures and transboundary cooperation within river basins.End

Hein T.C. van Stokkom
Waterboard Brabantse Delta
Breda, The Netherlands

Antonius J.M. Smits 
Centre for Sustainable Management of Resources
Institute for Science, Innovation and Society
Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Rob S.E.W. Leuven 
Department of Environmental Science
Institute for Wetland and Water Research
Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands

ESI Special Topics, November 2006
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2006/november-06-vanStokkom_Smits_Leuven.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.