|

|
Ralph Hingson answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Social Sciences, general. There
is also a Podcast available with additional commentary.
|
|
Podcast
formats:
mp3 (4.2 MB)
wma
(6.8 MB) |
From
•>>January 2007
Field:
Social Sciences, general
Article Title: Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among US college students ages 18-24: Changes from 1998 to 2001
Authors: Hingson,
R;Heeren, T;Winter, M;Wechsler, H
Journal: ANNU REV PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume: 26
Issue:
Page: :259-279
Year: 2005
* Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Prevent Alcohol Problems Among Young People, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
* Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Prevent Alcohol Problems Among Young People, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
* Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Underage drinking and alcohol use disorders among college
students are important public health problems that have received a
great deal of attention from the media, the general public, and,
increasingly, the research community. Our paper underscores and
corroborates other recent studies that have reported that excessive
alcohol use by college-aged individuals in the U.S. is a significant
source of harm.
In March 2002, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism (NIAAA) released a report entitled, "A Call to
Action: Changing the Culture of Drinking at U.S. Colleges."
This was sent to every college and university president in the
United States and posted on the internet (www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov),
along with background supporting papers published in the Journal
of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement 14, March 2002, "College
Drinking - What it is and what to do about it: A review of the state
of science."
Our group wrote an article that was extensively cited in that
report on the "Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and
morbidity among U.S. college students, 18-24," (J. Studies
on Alcohol, 63:136-144, 2002).
The paper published last year indicates that the problems
associated with college drinking, between the years 1998-2001,
expanded beyond the rate of increase in the numbers of students
enrolled in college. In other words, problems associated with
college drinking grew faster than the college population.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?
The review compares the number of alcohol-related traffic and
unintentional injury deaths in 1998 and 2001 among 18-24 year olds,
and estimates the number of deaths among persons in that age group
who were full- or part-time students attending either two- or
four-year colleges.
|
Ralph
Hingson Podcast:
mp3
(4.2 MB) or wma
(6.8 MB) |
Interventions
to Reduce College Age Drinking:
Research
in peer-review scientific literature identified
little evidence that programs designed solely to
provide information about harms associated with
alcohol use or values clarification programs
reduce drinking and related harms. However,
experimental studies have found that several
skills-based interventions including
self-monitoring and self-assessment as well as
screening programs that identify high-risk
drinkers who then are offered brief motivational
interventions can reduce drinking and related
problems. Most college students with alcohol use
disorders, however, do not believe they have
drinking problems and are not screened or
counseled.
The
most powerful environmental intervention to reduce
drinking among college age persons was raising the
minimum legal drinking age to 21. Also,
zero-tolerance laws which make it illegal for
persons under 21 to drive after any drinking have
contributed to declines in alcohol-related traffic
deaths among people under 21. The preponderance of
studies indicate that raising the price of alcohol
and reducing alcohol outlet density can reduce
drinking and related problems among college-age
persons.
Several
carefully conducted community-based initiatives
have had success in reducing drinking and/or
alcohol-related problems among young people. These
programs typically coordinate efforts of city
officials from multiple departments of city
government, schools, health, police, alcohol
beverage control, etc., as well as concerned
private citizens and organizations.
These
programs often incorporate multiple intervention
strategies, including: school-based programs
involving student peer leaders, parents, and
merchants who sell alcohol; media advocacy;
community organizing and mobilization;
environmental policy change to reduce availability
of alcohol to youth; heightened enforcement of
laws regulating sales and distribution of alcohol;
and enforcement of laws to reduce alcohol-related
traffic injuries and death.
|
|
Information was integrated from multiple datasets, including the
U.S. Department of Transportation Fatality Analysis Reporting System
(FARS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Injury
Mortality files. Other sources included the Department of Education’s
National Center for Education Statistics on Enrollment in U.S.
Colleges, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, and the
Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Survey of Students
from 119 accredited four-year colleges.
The paper also reviewed interventions
(see table) that
have been identified in the peer-reviewed scientific literature to
reduce college drinking and its associated problems.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
Among college students ages 18-24, from 1998 to 2001,
alcohol-related unintentional injury deaths increased from nearly
1,575 to more than 1,700—an increase of 6% per college student
population. From 1999 to 2002, the proportion of college students
18-24 who drank five or more drinks on at least one occasion
increased from 41.7% to 43.7%, a non-significant increase.
However, the proportion who, in the previous year, reported
driving under the influence of alcohol increased from 26.5% to
31.4%, a highly significant proportional increase of 18%, from
2,297,550 students to 2,792,716 students. In 2001, 599,000 (10.5%)
were injured because of drinking; 474,000 (8%) had unprotected sex
because of drinking; 690,000 (12%) were assaulted or hit by another
drinking college student; and 97,000 (2%) experienced an
alcohol-related sexual assault or date rape.
Because only 32% of the 8,894,000 18-24-year-olds in 2001 in the
U.S. were enrolled in college, the total number of 18-24-year-olds
nation-wide who died from alcohol-related unintentional injury
deaths greatly exceeds the numbers among college students that age,
5,367 compared to 1,717.
Heavy drinking college students not only place their own health
at risk, they jeopardize the well-being of others. As many as 46% of
the 4,553 people killed in 2001 in crashes involving 18-24-year-old
drinking drivers were persons other than the drinking driver, and in
2001, over 690,000 college students were hit or assaulted by another
drinking college student, and 97,000 were the victim of a date rape
or sexual assault perpetrated by a drinking college student.
Further, new research illustrates that persons who drink to
excess even before they enter college were more likely to experience
alcohol-related problems in high school and college. This
underscores the need for both colleges and the communities in which
they are located to implement interventions to reduce excessive
drinking and related problems in these populations.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there obstacles
along the way?
Traffic crashes are the leading cause of alcohol-related death
among U.S. college students. I began studying legal and community
interventions to reduce alcohol-related traffic deaths more than 25
years ago, with colleagues at the Boston University School of Public
Health.
We have published research on the effects of raising the legal
drinking age, zero-tolerance laws that make it illegal for persons
under 21 to drive after any drinking, lowering legal blood alcohol
limits from 0.10% to 0.08%, setting even lower legal limits for
drivers convicted of driving while intoxicated, and comprehensive
community interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.
More recently, we undertook a series of analyses which found
persons who began drinking at younger ages are more likely to
experience alcohol dependence, develop alcohol dependence more
rapidly and before age 25, and experience chronic relapsing
dependence characterized by multiple episodes of longer duration and
meeting more dependence diagnostic criteria.
Persons who began drinking at younger ages are also more likely
to be injured in motor vehicle crashes after drinking, be in
physical fights, and have unplanned and unprotected sex after
drinking. We have reported that the younger people are when first
intoxicated, the greater their likelihood while in college to be
alcohol-dependent, drive after drinking, ride with drinking drivers,
injured because of drinking, and have unplanned and unprotected sex
after drinking.
In 1994, I was awarded a grant by the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation to review the scientific literature on interventions to
reduce college drinking. Then, in 1998, NIAAA established a task
force of college presidents and U.S. researchers to review the
magnitude and dimensions of college drinking problems and
interventions to reduce the problems. I chaired a task force
subcommittee examining interventions, wrote a paper on comprehensive
community interventions, and also a paper on the magnitude of
mortality and morbidity associated with drinking among college
students ages 18-24.
The greatest obstacles to making precise estimates of the annual
number of deaths associated with college drinking is the absence of
identifiers in the Fatality Analyses Reporting System of whether
people killed in alcohol-related fatal traffic crashes were college
students, and the absence of information on blood-alcohol levels of
persons who die from non-traffic injury deaths in the CDC injury
mortality files.
Because most fatally injured drivers in fatal crashes are tested
for blood alcohol level, researchers can track trends in the
incidence of alcohol-related fatal crashes and do quasi-experimental
studies that evaluate the impact of alcohol and drinking during law
changes and community programs to reduce impaired driving. We lack
similar measures for injury deaths other than traffic injuries,
e.g., homicides, suicides, falls, drowning, burns, etc.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Injuries are the leading cause of death among persons ages 1-44
in the United States, and alcohol is arguably the leading
contributor to these deaths. A recent CDC report estimated that
40,000 injury deaths annually are attributable to alcohol, at least
half among persons under 44. Because injury deaths are more likely
to occur among young people, the 40,000 alcohol-attributable injury
deaths account for twice as many years of preventable lost life as
the 35,000 alcohol-attributable chronic disease deaths. Alcohol is
the third leading contributor to years of preventable life lost in
the United States.
Among college students ages 18-24 and same-age persons not in
college, injuries are the leading cause of alcohol-related deaths,
accounting for more than 5,000 deaths annually. This total includes
people who may not themselves have been drinking, such as persons
who die in motor vehicle crashes involving drinking by another
person, or victims of assaults perpetrated by persons who were
drinking.
Colleges and surrounding communities need to implement or expand
initiatives to reduce excessive college drinking and the harms these
drinkers inflict on themselves and others. Research is needed to
expand our understanding of how to reduce these problems. The NIAAA,
which supported me and my co-authors of this paper through a
Research Center Grant to Prevent Alcohol Problems among Young
People, currently funds more than 50 research projects totaling more
than $18 million annually.
As noted in this article, several interventions have already been
identified that can reduce college drinking and related harm. New
interventions may also be identified through the currently funded
research. As colleges and communities attempt to curb excessive
drinking and related harms among college-age individuals, they
should strive to implement programs and policies identified through
rigorous empirical research to successfully address this important
national public health problem.
Ralph W. Hingson, Sc.D., M.P.H.
Director, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD, USA
All external sites will open in a new browser.
The Thomson Corporation and esi-topics.com does not endorse external sites.
|
ESI Special Topics,
January 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2007/january-07-RalphHingson.html
|
|