Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Despite a long-standing presumption on the part of most
economists that cartels are fundamentally unstable, we find
that, across many countries and historical periods, the average
duration of cartels is between five and seven years. This
conclusion draws on our overview of empirical regularities
associated with cartels active in the 19th, 20th, and 21st
centuries in the United States, Europe, and Japan, as well as
international cartels.
 |
 |
|
“Our current research focuses on
contemporary international cartels, with
particular interest in the intersection of
competition policy and trade policy.” |
|
We examine the effects of cartels on prices and non-price
competition, along with the determinants of cartel duration. We
find considerable dispersion in cartel duration: a large number
of cartels break down within a year or two, but there are many
that endure, including a large fraction that last a decade or
more.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
Theoretical research on cartels over the last two decades
has deepened our understanding of the possibilities for
cartel success, but has not been able to make many
generalizations or empirical predictions. Partly as a
result, recent empirical research has focused on case
studies of individual cartels. This paper is unique in
synthesizing these case studies with cross-sectional
evidence and relating it to theory, in order to provide
general lessons and a direction for future research and
competition policy.
Would
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
Competition can be very intense and results in low profit
margins. Firms respond to competition in a variety of ways,
but, over the last hundred years, a large number have
reacted by talking to their competitors in order to fix
prices and artificially limit supply, in an effort to
eliminate competition. In many cases, firms divide markets
geographically and assign customers to particular suppliers.
Since many of these cartels are in raw materials and
other intermediate goods, they can harm both the companies
that buy from them and the final consumers that those
companies sell to. We find that, although some of these
cartels fall apart quickly, many do not, indicating that the
potential for consumer harm is significant and that there is
a necessary role for policy oversight.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any
particular problems encountered along the way?
We had each individually engaged in empirical research on
cartels, analyzing case studies and cross-sections from
different historical periods. We thought there would be much
to learn in bringing together these different empirical
methodologies.
Where
do you see your research leading in the future?
Our current research focuses on contemporary
international cartels, with particular interest in the
intersection of competition policy and trade policy.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Our research suggests that there is an important role for
effective competition policy in both well-established market
economies and newly emerging market economies. Unimpeded,
international cartels distort trade, harm consumers, and put
new entrants—especially those from developing countries—at a
disadvantage.
Valerie Y. Suslow, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Business Economics & Public Policy
Ross School of Business
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Margaret C. Levenstein, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Michigan Census Research Data Center
Associate Research Scientist, Survey Research Center, Institute
for Social Research
Adjunct Associate Professor, Business Economics & Public Policy
Ross School of Business
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, USA