Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Aron Goldhirsch

ESI Special Topics, March 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2007/march-07-AronGoldhirsch.html

Aron Goldhirsch answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the field of Clinical Medicine.


From •>>March 2007

Field: Clinical Medicine
Article Title: Meeting highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005
Authors: Goldhirsch, A;Glick, JH;Gelber, RD;Coates, AS;Thurlimann, B;Senn, H;Albain, KS;Bergh, J;Castiglione-Gertsch, M;Coates, AS;Costa, A;Cuzick, J;Davidson, N;Forbes, JF;Gelber, RD;Goss, P;Harris, J;Glick, JH;Goldhirsch, A;Howell, A;Ingle, JN;Jakesz, R;Jassem, J;Kaufmann, M;Martin, M;Mauriac, L;Morrow, M;Mouridsen, HT;Namer, M;Piccart-Gebhart, MJ;Possinger, K;Pritchard, K;Rutgers, EJT;Thurlimann, B;Viale, G;Wallgren, A;Wood, WC
Journal: ANN ONCOL
Volume: 16
Issue: 10
Page: 1569-1583
Year: OCT 2005
* European Inst Oncol, Int Breast Canc Study Grp, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy.
* European Inst Oncol, Int Breast Canc Study Grp, I-20141 Milan, Italy.
* Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Int Breast Canc Study Grp, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
* Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
* Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
* Canc Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
* Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
* Kantonsspital, Div Gynecol Oncol, St Gallen, Switzerland.
* Zentrum Tumor Diagnost & Pravent, St Gallen, Switzerland.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

Because it helps oncologists and other professionals to understand the best use of adjuvant systemic therapies for women with breast cancer.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?


“Discussing updated information, including features which are readily available across the world, makes treatment choices for women in several countries much easier, even across social and economic boundaries.”

 

It describes the method for a synthesis of knowledge.

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?

An expert consensus meeting took place in January 2005, making a fundamental change in the algorithm for selecting adjuvant systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer. Rather than the earlier approach, commencing with risk assessment, the experts indicated that, after operation and pathological evaluation of the disease, first consideration should be given to the degree of responsiveness to hormonal therapies.

Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive, endocrine non-responsive, and tumors of uncertain endocrine responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according to menopausal status. Only then did the experts consider three categories of risk of relapse: low-, intermediate-, and high-risk.

The panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for endocrine nonresponsive disease, endocrine therapy as the primary therapy for endocrine responsive disease, and adding chemotherapy for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category, and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk group.

The experts updated new information from trials which tested adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin®). These were added to the algorithm of treatment choice, but will be discussed more thoroughly during the 2007 edition.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research, and where there obstacles along the way?

The first St. Gallen Conference with an "official" expert consensus session was the third such St. Gallen meeting on "Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer" and occurred in February, 1988. I was personally involved in presenting crucial questions on controversial issues and continued this activity in several editions of the conference, sharing responsibility with Dr. John H. Glick, Director of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, and Dr. William C. Wood, Chief of the Department of Surgery, Emory University Hospital, School of Medicine, NE Atlanta, GA, USA. Significant merits in the process are to be ascribed to Dr. Richard D. Gelber, Professor of Biostatistics, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, and Dr. Alan S. Coates, former Chief of the Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, Australia.

ST:  Are there any social or political implications for your research?

Discussing updated information, including features which are readily available across the world, makes treatment choices for women in several countries much easier, even across social and economic boundaries.End

Aron Goldhirsch, M.D.
Professor of Medical Oncology
Director, Dept. of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology
Milan, Italy 
and
Head, Division of Medical Oncology
Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland
Bellinzona, Switzerland

ESI Special Topics, March 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2007/march-07-AronGoldhirsch.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.