|
Aron Goldhirsch answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Clinical Medicine.
From
•>>March 2007
Field:
Clinical Medicine
Article Title: Meeting highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005
Authors: Goldhirsch,
A;Glick, JH;Gelber, RD;Coates, AS;Thurlimann,
B;Senn, H;Albain, KS;Bergh, J;Castiglione-Gertsch, M;Coates,
AS;Costa, A;Cuzick, J;Davidson, N;Forbes, JF;Gelber, RD;Goss,
P;Harris, J;Glick, JH;Goldhirsch, A;Howell, A;Ingle, JN;Jakesz,
R;Jassem, J;Kaufmann, M;Martin, M;Mauriac, L;Morrow,
M;Mouridsen, HT;Namer, M;Piccart-Gebhart, MJ;Possinger,
K;Pritchard, K;Rutgers, EJT;Thurlimann, B;Viale, G;Wallgren,
A;Wood, WC
Journal: ANN ONCOL
Volume: 16
Issue: 10
Page: 1569-1583
Year: OCT 2005
* European Inst Oncol, Int Breast Canc Study Grp, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy.
* European Inst Oncol, Int Breast Canc Study Grp, I-20141 Milan, Italy.
* Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Int Breast Canc Study Grp,
Bellinzona, Switzerland.
* Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
* Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
* Canc Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
* Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
* Kantonsspital, Div Gynecol Oncol, St Gallen, Switzerland.
* Zentrum Tumor Diagnost & Pravent, St Gallen, Switzerland.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
Because it helps oncologists and other professionals to
understand the best use of adjuvant systemic therapies for women
with breast cancer.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?
|

“Discussing updated information, including features which are readily available across the world, makes treatment choices for women in several countries much easier, even across social and economic boundaries.”
|
|
|
It describes the method for a synthesis of knowledge.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
An expert consensus meeting took place in January 2005, making a
fundamental change in the algorithm for selecting adjuvant systemic
therapies for women with early breast cancer. Rather than the
earlier approach, commencing with risk assessment, the experts
indicated that, after operation and pathological evaluation of the
disease, first consideration should be given to the degree of
responsiveness to hormonal therapies.
Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive,
endocrine non-responsive, and tumors of uncertain endocrine
responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according
to menopausal status. Only then did the experts consider three
categories of risk of relapse: low-, intermediate-, and high-risk.
The panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for
endocrine nonresponsive disease, endocrine therapy as the primary
therapy for endocrine responsive disease, and adding chemotherapy
for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category,
and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the
uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk
group.
The experts updated new information from trials which tested
adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin®).
These were added to the algorithm of treatment choice, but will be
discussed more thoroughly during the 2007 edition.
How
did you become involved in this research, and where there obstacles
along the way?
The first St. Gallen Conference with an "official"
expert consensus session was the third such St. Gallen meeting on
"Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer" and occurred in
February, 1988. I was personally involved in presenting crucial
questions on controversial issues and continued this activity in
several editions of the conference, sharing responsibility with Dr.
John H. Glick, Director of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, and Dr. William C. Wood, Chief
of the Department of Surgery, Emory University Hospital, School of
Medicine, NE Atlanta, GA, USA. Significant merits in the process are
to be ascribed to Dr. Richard D. Gelber, Professor of Biostatistics,
Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
USA, and Dr. Alan S. Coates, former Chief of the Cancer Council
Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Discussing updated information, including features which are
readily available across the world, makes treatment choices for
women in several countries much easier, even across social and
economic boundaries.
Aron Goldhirsch, M.D.
Professor of Medical Oncology
Director, Dept. of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology
Milan, Italy
and
Head, Division of Medical Oncology
Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland
Bellinzona, Switzerland
|
ESI Special Topics,
March 2007
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2007/march-07-AronGoldhirsch.html
|
|