Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
 |
 |
|
“A social implication of our research is
that individuals should appreciate the
positive connections between their work and
family pursuits and learn how to leverage
their participation in each role for the
betterment of the other role.” |
|
After many years of domination by a conflict or interference
perspective, work-family researchers had begun to recognize the
positive effects that work and family roles can have on one
another. However, there was no broad theoretical framework to
explain these positive interdependencies. Our article filled
this gap by providing a theoretical model that integrated the
emerging findings and suggested areas for future research.
Does
it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of knowledge?
Our article’s primary contribution is synthesizing and
integrating existing findings within a theoretical framework. We
did not discover the positive interdependencies between work and
family roles but rather provided a conceptual model of these
interdependencies to guide future research.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
The theoretical model presented in our article explained how
an individual’s experiences in one role (work or family) enhance
performance and positive emotions in the other role (family or
work).
We proposed that resources (e.g., skills, self-confidence)
acquired in a role can be applied directly to the other role to
promote high performance and positive emotions in the latter
role (instrumental path).
In addition, resources can produce positive emotions in the
same role, which can subsequently be transferred to the other
role to enhance performance and positive emotions in the latter
role (affective path).
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there obstacles
along the way?
We had conducted research on the negative side of the
work-family interface (i.e., work-family conflict) for many
years. Many scholars had begun to call for research on the
positive side of the work-family interface and we saw an
opportunity to help stimulate and guide this research by
proposing a theory of work-family enrichment. Because the field
was ready to consider these positive effects, we did not
experience obstacles to presenting our views.
Where
do you see your research leading in the future?
We have collected data on work-family enrichment and are
currently examining the factors that promote high levels of
enrichment. We are also trying to understand how individuals’
decisions in everyday life affect the relationship between their
work and family roles.
Are
there any social or political implications for your research?
Our theory indicates that employees’ work experiences have
the capacity to strengthen their family lives just as their
experiences in the family domain have the potential to
strengthen their work lives.
A social implication of our research is that individuals
should appreciate the positive connections between their work
and family pursuits and learn how to leverage their
participation in each role for the betterment of the other role.
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
Professor and William A. Mackie Chair
Department of Management
LeBow College of Business
1
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Gary N. Powell
Professor of Management and Ackerman Scholar
Director, School of Business Ph.D. Program