By Professor Michael R. Sussman
ESI Special Topics, May
2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/comments/may-02-MichaelRSussman.html
|
Professor Michael R. Sussman
answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in field of
Plant & Animal Science.
From
•>>May 2002
Field: Plant & Animal Science
Article Title: T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis
Authors: Krysan, PJ;Young, JC;Sussman, MR
Journal: PLANT CELL
Volume: 11
Page: 2283-2290
Year: DEC 1999
* Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Biotechnol, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
* Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Biotechnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
|
Why do you think your paper is highly cited?
This paper is a review describing the now widely used method of
insertional mutagenesis for obtaining a knockout mutation in each
and every gene of the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. My
laboratory published an earlier research paper (Krysan, Young, Tax
and Sussman, PNAS 93:8145-8150, 1996) which laid out the
basic methodology for the technique, and this review elaborated on
the procedure and pointed out some of the pros and cons of the
overall strategy. After the PNAS paper, we also received NSF
funding to establish an international Arabidopsis knockout
facility at the University of Wisconsin, and this paper is one of
those we recommend people read to become familiar with the
technique.
Does it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful
to others?
Yes, it describes an excellent and exhaustive means of performing
reverse genetics in plants. Plants hate to do homologous
recombination (unlike yeast and mammals) but since recent easy
methods have been devised to obtain tens of thousands of random
insertional mutations, this insertional mutagenesis approach is
quite adequate.
Can you give us some background on this research?
The PCR method originally described in 1996 and in this review
has now been complemented by using TAIL PCR from DNA isolated from
individual T-DNA lines, which since the entire Arabidopsis
genome has been sequenced, allows one to know definitively where the
insertion has occurred in that seed. Thus, NSF is now funding
several projects where tens and hundreds of thousands of such
individual lines are being characterized and provided to academic
scientists at no cost, just by contacting the Ohio State University Arabidopsis
Seed and DNA Resource Facility. Thus, one can simply screen a
database in silico to find out if a knockout mutant seed in
your gene of interest exists in the public collection. However, one
should be aware that small genes are very difficult to isolate in
this random insertional mutagenesis procedure and, together with the
large number of genes duplicated in tandem, represent a proportion
of the genome (ca. 20%) from which knockout mutants will probably
not be accessible using current screening procedures.
Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's
terms?
Reverse genetics is essential in understanding the function of
each and every one of the 25,000 Arabidopsis genes. Our paper
describes a method in which a plant can be identified in which only
the one gene you are interested is deleted. In forward genetics, you
first identify a phenotypically unusual plant and then you try to
figure out which DNA sequence has been changed. In reverse genetics,
we do the opposite, i.e., we first isolate a plant containing a
mutant gene, and then we ask, what is the phenotype?
Professor Michael R. Sussman,
Professor of Genetics and Director of the UW Biotechnology Center,
UW-Madison.
|
ESI Special Topics, May
2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/comments/may-02-MichaelRSussman.html
|
|
|