Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Professor Max Coltheart

ESI Special Topics, September 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/comments/september-02-MaxColtheart.html

Professor Max Coltheart answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in field of Psychiatry/Psychology


From •>>September 2002

Field: Psychiatry/Psychology
Article Title: DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud
Authors: Coltheart, M;Rastle, K;Perry, C;Langdon, R;Ziegler, J
Journal: PSYCHOL REV
Volume: 108
Page: 204-256
Year: JAN 2001
* Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Ctr Cognit Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
* Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Ctr Cognit Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
* Univ Aix Marseille 1, CNRS, Marseille, France.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

It describes the most comprehensive theory currently in existence about the set of mental processes people use for reading—both for recognizing printed words and for reading aloud. The paper also offers explanations of a variety of different patterns of reading impairment that can be seen after brain damage, as well as having something to say about children's reading problems.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or new methodology that's useful to others?

It describes a methodology known as "nested modeling". The idea here is that when you develop a new theory which can explain certain previously puzzling findings in some field that other theories cannot explain, this is pointless unless you also show that the new theory can also explain the phenomena that those previous theories can also explain. Otherwise you are not making any progress. Sounds obvious: but it is rarely done in cognitive psychology.

ST:  What were some of the circumstances that led you to do this research?

Continuous research funding for this particular research from the Australian Research Council over a 10-year period. This was indeed a big project!

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?

When you learn to read, what you learn is a complicated set of skills, each skill to do with one specific part of the reading process (e.g. how to recognize letters, how to recognize whole words, how to use letter-sound rules, etc). To understand how people read, we need to know what exactly are these different skills, and how they interact with each other. The DRC model of reading proposes an answer to this question. What's more, it is a computational model—that is, "t" is an actual computer program that recognizes words and reads aloud, and the program does this while using exactly the same set of skills that we think human readers use. Skilled human readers show various different patterns of impaired reading after brain damage and these same patterns of errors can also be seen in the reading of the DRC model when different parts of the program are disabled.End

Professor Max Coltheart DSc FASSA FAA FBA
ARC Federation Fellow and Scientific Director, Macquarie Centre for
Cognitive Science,
Building C5A Room 570
Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109 Australia

ESI Special Topics, September 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/comments/september-02-MaxColtheart.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.