In
the past 10 years, your 10 most-cited papers have scored 660 total
citations. Most of these papers look at the factors controlling cell
growth. An important theme running through this research is to learn
from bench research how to improve the 5-year survival rate. Why is
pancreatic cancer so important to you?
Cancer can occur in any organ of the human body. Individual
cells begin to reproduce in greater numbers than normal, the
surrounding tissue cannot restrain the growth, and then they
escape and invade other tissues or organs. Cancer commonly
occurs as a result of genetic defects.
Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses of all human
malignancies. It is an aggressive disease and the overall 5-year
survival rate is less than 1%. Between 75% and 85% of patients
present with inoperable tumors. Unfortunately, conventional
oncological approaches such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy
have failed to improve the prognosis in a relevant manner.
|

“Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst
prognoses of all human malignancies.” |
|
In the past two decades many laboratories have concentrated
on understanding the molecular alterations that are present in
pancreatic cancer. That’s my area of research, and our goal is
to improve diagnosis and prognosis.
How
did you get into the field in the first place?
I did my medical training at the University of Tübingen in
Germany and then at the University of Munich. For the last part
of this medical training I went to Switzerland to the University
of Bern, where I met the research group under Professor Helmut
Friess and Professor Markus Büchler. They were mainly interested
in pancreatic surgery and research, and it was through them that
I entered the field. I still work with both of them.
My postdoctoral training was at the University of California,
Irvine (Professor Murray Korc), for two years, and that’s where
I really started research on the molecular biology of pancreatic
cancer. After those two years I returned to Bern, stayed for
three more years, and then we all moved here, to Heidelberg.
What
is the international standing of the European Pancreatic Cancer
Centre?
We’re within the surgical department of the University of
Heidelberg, which is one of the leading centers worldwide, with
about 400 pancreatic operations a year. Importantly, we have
established a very strong center for molecular biology and
translational research, and next door we have the German Cancer
Research Centre, with whom we have several collaborations. The
infrastructure for our research is first rate.
So
in broad terms what is your research agenda these days?
The focus today has shifted somewhat from the period seven or
eight years ago that resulted in the highly cited papers we’ll
discuss in a moment; back then we did not know a lot, and were
just cherry-picking. Now we have a different approach, with high
throughput analysis, particularly high-volume micro-array
analysis. Today we can fish out from thousands of genes the few
that might be relevant to pancreatic cancer.
If we are going to beat this disease we really need to find
the genes or the genetic alterations that are important for
pancreatic cancer, with the ultimate goal to find some new
markers for the disease and therapeutic targets. This we have
been doing for some years, and we have now identified several
candidate genes. One part of our research is to look at these
different genes in more depth and see if there are candidates
for therapeutic intervention.
Your
1999 Oncogene paper ("The TGF-beta signaling inhibitor Smad7
enhances tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer," 18[39]: 5363-72, 23
September 1999) and your 1999 Biochemical and Biophysical
Research Communications paper ("Smad6 suppresses TGF-beta-induced
growth inhibition in COLO-357 pancreatic cancer cells and is
overexpressed in pancreatic cancer," 255[2]: 268-73, 16 February
1999) are about the inhibitory Smads, 6 and 7. What is the
importance of these signaling molecules in pancreatic cancer?
Let me first give the background to this interesting topic.
Before we did this work we already understood that there were
certain growth factors like the transforming growth factor (TGF)
beta family that we knew were over-expressed in pancreatic
cancer. The tumors produce a lot of these factors, and at the
same time it was known that patients who produce a lot have a
worse survival. We also knew that these factors were suppressing
the growth of tumor cells. So it was quite a puzzle: you have a
factor that suppresses tumor growth and yet at the same time the
tumor is producing it!
The puzzle was resolved in 1996 by Hahn and colleagues (Science
271: 350-353) with the breakthrough discovery of a mutation in
the central aspect of the TGF-beta signaling pathway
(Smad4/DPC4). But the mutation was only observed in about 50% of
the cancers, so it was still not clear what happened in the
other tumors. So we looked at recently discovered members of
this signaling pathway: the Smad6 and Smad7 molecules. These can
act as inhibitors of the TGF-beta signaling pathway.
What we showed was that these inhibitory Smads are actually
also over-expressed in pancreatic cancer; that provided another
way for the tumors to become resistant to the growth-suppressive
effects of TGF-beta.
We were among the first to show that inhibitory Smads are
important in pancreatic cancer as well as in cancer in general.
Our achievement was showing how the tumor cells could become
resistant to the growth-suppressive effects of TGF-betas.
These papers are highly cited because they showed how this
signaling pathway is altered in pancreatic cancer; it’s not
restricted just to the case of the pancreas but is important for
other neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases. We have learned
over the years that this TGF-beta signaling pathway is one key
factor in pancreatic carcinogenesis.
Your
1998 Journal of Clinical Investigation paper ("The
cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan glypican-1 regulates
growth factor action in pancreatic carcinoma cells and is
overexpressed in human pancreatic cancer," 102[9]: 1662-73, 1
November 1998) is also about growth factors. What's the main finding
here?
The
background to this is different from inhibitory growth factors
such as TGF-betas. Research done in the ‘90s had shown that
pancreatic tumors also express a number of potent growth
stimulatory factors that can influence tumor growth, invasion,
and metastasis.
We were motivated to look at glypican-1, which is part of a
family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans, because they can
modulate how cells respond to growth factors. What we showed was
that this cell-surface bound molecule is really important for
the signaling of a certain group of growth factors that are
known as heparin-binding growth factors. These growth factors
need a co-receptor to bind to the cell in order to stimulate the
growth of the tumor cells.
We demonstrated that pancreatic tumors express a large amount
of these cell-surface molecules, and we showed by different
methods that if you don’t have this molecule (or if it cannot
function well) then these growth factors do not act on
pancreatic cancer cells. The family of glypicans is quite large,
and we found that it is specifically glypican-1 which regulates
growth factor action. Finding that glypican-1 is over-expressed
is significant because it means you can target therapies if
tumors over-express this protein.
This paper is related to the previous one. The heparan
sulfate proteoglycans are very complex molecules, which
constitute prominent components of basement membranes and
extracellular matrix (ECM). What we knew was that there are
certain enzymes that are able to modify these molecules by
cutting their side chains, thus facilitating disassembly of the
ECM and enhancing cell invasion.
One of these degrading enzymes is heparanase. By the time we
were doing the research on the previous paper the protein had
been identified but not cloned. So when the first reports
appeared of the cloning of this enzyme we were interested to see
whether this was also important in pancreatic cancer.
We showed that there is increased expression of heparanase in
pancreatic cancer. It can change certain molecules and this
enables the cells to invade the microenvironment of the tumor.
That means the tumor spreads more, leading to early metastasis.
This has clinical relevance because patients with tumors that
express a lot of this enzyme have a worse clinical outcome.