Would
you please describe the significance of your paper and why it is highly
cited?
Our article "A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as
feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells"
describes a new way to culture better-quality human embryonic stem
cells (hESC). Until we initiated the derivation of hESC lines using
this new system, all lines had been derived using primary cultures
of fetal mouse fibroblasts as feeder cells. Feeder cells were needed
for non-differentiated growth of hESC. Thinking of use of these
cells in human cell transplantation, a contact with mouse cells is
totally impossible. The mouse cells contain microbes, such as
retroviruses, which can contaminate human hESC cultures, and they
also feed the cells with non-human proteins, which are immunogenic.
|

“Our
article was the first step towards safe clinical
use of hESC-derived cells.”
|
|
We decided to start using postnatal human skin fibroblasts as
feeder cells, and chose foreskin fibroblast lines, which can be
easily obtained by laboratories culturing human cells. Our first
experiments proved successful, and we never needed to use any other
feeder cells in the derivation and propagation of our present 29
hESC lines. It is much easier for all laboratories to use these
human skin cell lines than killing weekly mouse embryos and make
fibroblast lines from them. The quality has been easy to control.
How
did you become involved in this research, and were there any particular
successes or obstacle that stand out?
We are working in a laboratory that is located in close contact
with a clinical human in vitro fertilization facility. We
could not take mice to this human clinical unit. Hence, it was
necessary to start thinking of better options. That we wanted to
establish hESC lines was a natural consequence of our embryo
research project which we already had ongoing in our laboratory.
The only obstacle in the beginning was the negative attitude of
some co-workers. But I did not care about such comments as, "You can
never succeed using such cells. It will be a waste of embryos," and
said that I would test with five embryos. We got two lines from
those embryos.
Where
do you see your research and the broader field leading in the future?
Our culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts was very
quickly adopted by many laboratories. Today most of the human hESC
lines are cultured on such feeder cells. There are articles in which
other authors have shown how much better these human cells support
the growth of hESC. When the contamination of all old hESC lines
with mouse proteins and viruses became widely known and discussed in
the literature around 2005, our feeder system became really widely
used.
We and others have been developing even cleaner systems, and we
will soon have clinical grade human hESC, which have been totally
xeno-free at all stages of derivation and culture. Feeder-free
cultures have been developed, but they have not been fully xeno-free,
and feeder-free derivation conditions have produced abnormal cells.
What
are the social implications of your work?
Before human hESC derived cells can be used in human cell
transplantation, these cells have to meet several safety criteria.
They must not contain microbes, which can contaminate human cells
and tissue. They should not contain immunogenic non-human proteins,
which promote rejection of the cells after transplantation. The
cells should be chromosomally normal and contain as small amount of
other mutations as possible.
We and several other groups are now developing completely xeno-free
new derivation and up-scaling methods in order to obtain safe hESC
lines for differentiation for human cell transplantation. It all
started with the work published in this article, and since then we
have made and published several improvements into the system. Our
article was the first step towards safe clinical use of hESC-derived
cells.
Dr. Outi Hovatta
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, Sweden